BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 8Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Cuttack7Jaipur3Mumbai3Hyderabad3Telangana2Delhi2Kolkata2Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 80I3Section 1483Section 143(3)2

BSC C&C JV,NEW DELHI vs. NEAC, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as

ITA 705/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.705/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 बनाम Bsc C&C Jv Assessing Officer, 74, Hemkunt Colony, Vs. National E-Assessment New Delhi. Centre, Delhi. Pan No. Aadfb8115G अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 80I

transfer) also falls within eligible construction activity, that is, activity eligible for deduction under section 80-IA inasmuch as mere 'development' as such and unassociated/unaccompanied with 'operate' and 'maintenance' also falls within such business activity as is eligible for deduction under section 80-IA. Therefore, merely because the present assessee was paid bu the Government, for development work, it cannot

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. JAWAHAR LAL KESARWANI, NOIDA

In the result the C.O. of the assessee stands allowed whereas

ITA 6108/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. G.D. Agrawal & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavadcit Jawahar Lal Kesarwani Central Circle-20 809, Valencia Tower, New Delhi Mahagun Mapple Vs. Apartment, Sector-50 Noida Pan : Akepk2123Q

For Appellant: Sh. Rajiv Saxena, Ms. Sumongla Saxena, ShFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 143(1)Section 148

transferred to Sh. U.D. Kesarwani and his close relatives at through away prices ofRs. 1/- only. It means, in a nutshell, that Rs. 16 cr. of back money was converted at a price of Rs. 16 lacs only. This has resulted in a huge ;loss to the Government exchequer by deliberate evasion of income tax. Name