BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 50Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Delhi7Bangalore5Chennai4Kolkata3Ahmedabad3Hyderabad3Karnataka2Surat1Jaipur1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 54F18Section 27Section 2637Capital Gains6Long Term Capital Gains6Section 50C5Deduction4Section 453Addition to Income3

ANALJIT SINGH,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(2), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4737/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Dec 2017AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P.Kant

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 50D

section 50D does not empower the Revenue 48 | P a g e I.T.A .No.-4737/Del/2017 authorities to substitute the declared/determined consideration agreed between the parties with the fair market value of the assets subject to transfer. Thus, he submitted that the substitution of actual sale consideration of Rs.1241.32 crores with hypothetical consideration of Rs.2233.42 crores is sans any authority

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE-49(1), DELHI vs. BHARAT KALIA, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 295/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed
Exemption3
Revision u/s 2633
Section 143(3)2
ITAT Delhi
10 Apr 2026
AY 2022-23
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 50C

50D of the Act, where the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer is not ascertainable or cannot be determined. As per section 50CA, the FMV determined by applying Rule 11UAA shall be deemed deer to be the full value of consideration received or accruing as a result of transfer of unquoted equity shares. That Mis Lifelong

NEELU ANALJIT SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-9, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed with above directions

ITA 2172/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishimrs. Neelu Analjit Singh, Vs. The Addl. Commissioner Of 15, Dr. Apj Abdul Kalam Road, Income Tax , New Delhi Special Range-9, Pan: Aatps06882D New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Chopra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Senior
Section 2Section 45

section 10 of the Income-tax Act, which is transferred during the period beginning on 1st April, 2014 and ending on 10th July, 2014, the period of holding for its-qualification as short-term capital asset shall be not-more than twelve months." Thus, the aforesaid circular clearly clinches the issue and clarifies that, firstly, the benefit of shorter period

AJAY GULIYA

ITA/423/2012HC Delhi16 Jul 2012
Section 45Section 45(1)

price as per clause 1 of the share purchase agreement dated 15th April, 2003? (i) Initial lump sum payment equal to 23 lakh US dollars (2.3 million US dollars) (referred in the share purchase agreement as the closing payment) received on July 1, 2003 in the previous year relevant to assessment year 2004-05. (ii) Contingent payment as per clause

SH. PRAVEEN KUMAR MALHOTRA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 16, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2270/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meeta Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 263Section 54F

price of the shares also were increased. It was further pointed out by the assessee that the purchaser of the shares, M/s. Veecon-IPA Gastechnik Ltd. is a renowned company specializing in design, installation and commissioning of industrial gas generation plants and gas purification systems. This company has acquired all the shares of M/s. Sundial Infotech Pvt. Ltd. the sale

SMT. NEELAM MALHOTRA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT- 16, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2271/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishiasstt. Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meeta Singh, CIT(DR)
Section 263Section 54F

price of the shares also were increased. It was further pointed out by the assessee that the purchaser of the shares, M/s. Veecon-IPA Gastechnik Ltd. is a renowned company specializing in design, installation and commissioning of industrial gas generation plants and gas purification systems. This company has acquired all the shares of M/s. Sundial Infotech Pvt. Ltd. the sale

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16 vs. SH. PRAVEEN KUMAR MALHOTRA

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA/568/2019HC Delhi11 Mar 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Section 263Section 50CSection 54F

price of the shares also were increased. It was further pointed out by the assessee that the purchaser of the shares, M/ s. Veecon-IPA Gastechnik Ltd. is a renowned company specializing in design, installation and commissioning of industrial gas generation plants and gas purification systems. This company has acquired all the shares of M/s. Sundial Infotech