BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 44Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27Delhi14Dehradun6

Key Topics

Section 44D32Section 271(1)(c)12Permanent Establishment10Business Income9Double Taxation/DTAA9Section 1828Section 9(1)8Section 115A8Section 288Section 234B8Deduction8Section 9(1)(vi)7

ARIBA INC,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (INTL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 4582/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2004-05
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

ARIBA INC,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (INTL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 4583/DEL/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

ARIBA INC.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 3923/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

ARIBA INC.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 1538/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

M/S. ARIBA INC.,GURGAON vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 1469/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

M/S. ARIBA INC.,GURGAON vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 1470/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

ARIBA INC.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 6090/DEL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

ARIBA INC,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT (INTL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 4584/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2022AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri Himanshu Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 182Section 234BSection 28Section 44DSection 9(1)

44D read with section 115A(1)(b) of the ITA. The balance amount of the royalty (which was held to be not attributable to the DAPE) was to be taxed at 15% under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. However, the CIT (A) granted relief on the additions made by the AO in these AYs on account of notional

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE GURGAON , GURUGRAM vs. LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY HEAT TRASFER BV- INDIA BRANCH OFFICE , GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 8919/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Bhagwati Charan, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 44D

transfer pricing order under section 92CA(3) of the Act. Disallowance of proportionate expenses 4,31,695 in relation to income taxable under section 44D

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE GURGAON , GURUGRAM vs. LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY HEAT TRASFER BV- INDIA BRANCH OFFICE , GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 8918/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Bhagwati Charan, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 44D

transfer pricing order under section 92CA(3) of the Act. Disallowance of proportionate expenses 4,31,695 in relation to income taxable under section 44D

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE GURGAON , GURUGRAM vs. LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY HEAT TRASFER BV- INDIA BRANCH OFFICE , GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 8917/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Vishal Kalra, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Bhagwati Charan, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 44D

transfer pricing order under section 92CA(3) of the Act. Disallowance of proportionate expenses 4,31,695 in relation to income taxable under section 44D

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. INFRASOFT LTD

ITA/1034/2009HC Delhi22 Nov 2013
Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 4Section 9(1)(vi)

44D read with Section 115A. 14. The CIT(A) vide the order dated 10.01.2008, rejected the submissions of the Assessee company. The CIT(A) in his order noted that the Assessee company was engaged in licensing of MX software which is an engineering friendly tool for designing all types of road projects to Indian customers. He noted the clarification

SABRE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL LLC,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 5782/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Tarandeep Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 44DSection 9Section 9(1)(vi)

price and the right time while being assured of complying with industry standards and regulations when using our solution. Our product merchandising solution will enable you to: Increase Revenue • Provides opportunity to generate incremental revenue through the sale of ancillary products and services • Provides connection to the largest global travel marketplace with access to more than 55,000 agency locations

ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 3(1)(2), NEW DELHI vs. SABRE DECISION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL LLC, USA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 7354/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Tarandeep Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gangadhar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 44DSection 9Section 9(1)(vi)

price and the right time while being assured of complying with industry standards and regulations when using our solution. Our product merchandising solution will enable you to: Increase Revenue • Provides opportunity to generate incremental revenue through the sale of ancillary products and services • Provides connection to the largest global travel marketplace with access to more than 55,000 agency locations