BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

110 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai155Delhi110Hyderabad57Jaipur26Chennai13Bangalore13Indore11Cuttack9Ahmedabad8Pune8Kolkata5SC3Cochin3Jodhpur2Chandigarh2Visakhapatnam2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)66Addition to Income46Section 153A34Disallowance29Section 9(1)(vi)26Section 14A25Double Taxation/DTAA24Deduction15Section 115J

TELETUBE ELECTRONICS LTD

The appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA/38/2002HC Delhi24 Sept 2015
Section 2Section 2(47)Section 260ASection 45Section 50

price of the asset was fixed it was between the parties to decide about the terms of payments which unless prohibited in the statute cannot be gone behind. 15. On an examination of the lease deed, the ITAT held that the leasehold rights in the business assets were sold for Rs.20.729 crore which was undoubtedly agreed to be paid

TELETUBE ELECTRONICS LTD

The appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA/132/2002HC Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 110 · Page 1 of 6

14
Natural Justice14
Transfer Pricing13
Section 143(2)12
24 Sept 2015
Section 2Section 2(47)Section 260ASection 45Section 50

price of the asset was fixed it was between the parties to decide about the terms of payments which unless prohibited in the statute cannot be gone behind. 15. On an examination of the lease deed, the ITAT held that the leasehold rights in the business assets were sold for Rs.20.729 crore which was undoubtedly agreed to be paid

TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 9, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7580/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Tiwari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Shah, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144

section 195 of the Act. 22.1.6 The Ld. AR also submitted that since the Ld. TPO examined the transaction of reimbursement of expenses in detail during the transfer pricing proceedings taking into account the documentary evidence submitted during the course of assessment proceedings and no adverse inference was drawn by him in his order dated 26.09.2017 in respect

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 7922/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5026/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 55/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 3080/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 3079/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5029/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 1978/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5024/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4921/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5025/DEL/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5027/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 7460/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4923/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWERE IRELAND LIMITED,DUBLIN 24, IRELAND vs. DCIT CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION , NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 1979/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5028/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4922/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer pricing analysis has been undertaken in respect of a instant case), nothing further would be left to be attributed to the alleged PE of Adobe Ireland and that, accordingly, would automatically extinguish the need for attribution of any additional profits to the alleged PE. • Without prejudice to the above, of any additional profits are required to be attributed

DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1361/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Oct 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmaaptive Components India P. Ltd, Vs. Deputy Commissioner (Formerly Known As Delphi Of Income-Tax, Automotive Systems P. Ltd), Circle-7(1), P-24, Green Park Extension, New Delhi South Delhi, New Delhi-110016 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaacd0226E

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92CSection 92C(2)

transfer pricing documentation maintained by the assessee, the transactions of purchase of tools was benchmarked applying TNMM method, by using combined transaction approach since the transaction was found to be inextricably linked to the manufacturing operations of Delphi India. The assessee had imported these tools from its AEs and sold to Tata Motors Ltd. It was pleaded by the assessee