BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

129 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 211clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai137Delhi129Hyderabad87Chennai33Jaipur27Bangalore21Raipur21Chandigarh17Guwahati16Pune15Surat13Ahmedabad12Visakhapatnam11Kolkata10Indore4Amritsar2Nagpur1Patna1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)57Addition to Income44Section 14A35Disallowance24Double Taxation/DTAA22Deduction21Section 143(2)19Section 144C(5)16Section 250

(Now known as Sony India Limited)

ITA/16/2014HC Delhi16 Mar 2015

Section 482 to the following effect: ―(a)The US distributor was simply given set transfer price and the development of the US market was at risk and economic cost of the US distributor. (b) The foreign parent indirectly subsidized the development of the US market through a reduced transfer price. (c) The foreign parent provided the distributor with a rebate

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LIMITED,IRELAND vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes subject to the directions contained in para 11, 18 and 19 above

ITA 913/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR

Showing 1–20 of 129 · Page 1 of 7

16
Section 144C16
Section 9(1)(vi)16
Section 92C15
Section 143(3)
Section 144C(13)

211/- pertaining to 3 ‘income from income tax interest’ in its return of income aggregating to total amount of Rs. 45,80,35,328/-. Other receipts viz. receipts from software supply and automated services are claimed non-taxable in India by the assessee. The case of the assessee was not referred to the Ld. Transfer Pricing Officer

ECOENERGY INSIGHTS LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHUBB ALBA CONTROL SYSTEMS P.LTD),NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above

ITA 2321/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaecoenergy Insights Ltd., Vs. Dcit, (Formerly Known As Chubb Alba Control Circle 4 (2), Systems P. Ltd.), New Delhi. Ground Floor, 18, Netaji Subhash Marg, Daryaganj, New Delhi – 110 002. (Pan :Aaaca0031C) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Nageshwar Rao, Advocate Shri Parth, Advocate Shri Pratik Rath, Advocate Revenue By : Shri S.K. Jadhav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 12.08.2025 Date Of Order : 10.11.2025 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman: 1. This Appeal Preferred By The Assessees Is Directed Against The Assessment Order Dated 25.07.2022Passed By The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department Under Section 147 Read With Section 144C(13) R.W.S. 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short ‘The Act”) For Ay 2018-19 Pursuant To The Directions Of The Dispute Resolution Panel U/S 144C(5) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Jadhav, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 92C

section 92CA. Consequently, the reference appears to be invalid, and the transfer pricing and subsequent proceedings also appear to be time barred. In this context it is necessary to make following submissions – (a) time barring being a mandate to the forum, Hon’ble Tribunal may have to decide this preliminary aspect (b) assuming time barring aspect is decided in favour

DCM SHRIRAM LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 2587/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

transfer of electricity from eligible unit to non-eligible unit is INR\n6.45 per KWH therefore, it was claimed that it is at ALP. The TPO\nhas obtained the rates from IEX and asked the assessee as to why\nExternal CUP method should not be applied, and sale rate of power\nshould not be taken at average price at which

DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI

ITA 4328/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

transfer of electricity from eligible unit to non-eligible unit is INR\n6.45 per KWH therefore, it was claimed that it is at ALP. The TPO\nhas obtained the rates from IEX and asked the assessee as to why\nExternal CUP method should not be applied, and sale rate of power\nshould not be taken at average price at which

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. DCM SHRIRAM LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 927/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2015-16
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

transfer of electricity from eligible unit to non-eligible unit is INR\n6.45 per KWH therefore, it was claimed that it is at ALP. The TPO\nhas obtained the rates from IEX and asked the assessee as to why\nExternal CUP method should not be applied, and sale rate of power\nshould not be taken at average price at which

DCM SHRIIRAM LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. NEAC, NEW DELHI

ITA 704/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

transfer of electricity from eligible unit to non-eligible unit is INR\n6.45 per KWH therefore, it was claimed that it is at ALP. The TPO\nhas obtained the rates from IEX and asked the assessee as to why\nExternal CUP method should not be applied, and sale rate of power\nshould not be taken at average price at which

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5029/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5026/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 3079/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4923/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5027/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5028/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5025/DEL/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4922/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 1978/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5024/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4921/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWERE IRELAND LIMITED,DUBLIN 24, IRELAND vs. DCIT CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION , NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 1979/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 3080/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

Section 182 of the ICA defines an agent as ‘a person who is employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons’. Thus, The relationship of an agency exists where one person has an authority or capacity to create legal relations between a person occupying the position of principal and third parties