BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

111 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai151Delhi111Kolkata42Bangalore29Chennai27Ahmedabad15Hyderabad6Jaipur5Indore5Chandigarh4Cuttack2Visakhapatnam2Pune2Rajkot2Guwahati2SC1Surat1Kerala1Jodhpur1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 194H100Section 4073Section 20144Deduction40Addition to Income39Section 143(3)38TDS34Disallowance33Section 201(1)21Section 144C

M/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 3865/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jun 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishinew Delhi Television Ltd, Vs. Acit, 207, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase- Circle-13(1), Iii, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aaacn0865D (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. New Delhi Television Ltd, Circle-13(1), 207, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacn0865D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Shri H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153Section 40Section 92C(2)

194H or under section 194J of the income tax act. Therefore, he grossed up the amount of the revenue shown by the assessee in the profit and loss account with the amount retained by those advertisement agents and disallowed Rs. 455330999/– under section 40(a) (ia) of the income tax act. 21. The assessee challenged the same before the learned

Showing 1–20 of 111 · Page 1 of 6

16
Section 92C15
Transfer Pricing14

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 3996/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jun 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishinew Delhi Television Ltd, Vs. Acit, 207, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase- Circle-13(1), Iii, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aaacn0865D (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. New Delhi Television Ltd, Circle-13(1), 207, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacn0865D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Shri H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153Section 40Section 92C(2)

194H or under section 194J of the income tax act. Therefore, he grossed up the amount of the revenue shown by the assessee in the profit and loss account with the amount retained by those advertisement agents and disallowed Rs. 455330999/– under section 40(a) (ia) of the income tax act. 21. The assessee challenged the same before the learned

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIR

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/124/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. AIR FRANCE

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/964/2008HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XVII vs. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/1269/2007HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. M/S AIR INDIA LTD.

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/1501/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. BRITISH AIRWAY PLC

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/256/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) vs. BELAIR TRAVELS & CARGO P.LTD.

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/105/2008HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD.

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/306/2005HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KUWAIT AIRWAYS CORPORATION

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/116/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/120/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S UNITED AIRLINES

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/117/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. KUWAIT AIRWAYS CORPORATION

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/108/2007HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/121/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S UNITED AIRLINES

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/118/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) vs. BELAIR TRAVELS & CARGO (P) LTD.

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/336/2008HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

C.I.T (TDS) vs. BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/969/2008HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/119/2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS vs. AIR FRANCE

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA/1139/2005HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL

In the result the appeal is allowed in ITA Nos

ITA - 120 / 2006HC Delhi13 Apr 2009

transferable and the difference between the full value of the ticket and the concessional price is not „income‟ within the meaning of Section 194H