M/S RELIGARE CAPITAL MARKETS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

1) to section 144C (14) of the income tax act. Therefore it is apparent that it is not an assessment scheme as applicable to other assesses. It is a scheme of assessment in respect of matters that included the transfer pricing

RELIGARE CAPITAL MARKETS LTD.,NOIDA vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

1) to section 144C (14) of the income tax act. Therefore it is apparent that it is not an assessment scheme as applicable to other assesses. It is a scheme of assessment in respect of matters that included the transfer pricing

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed

144C of the said Act. 3. The Transfer Pricing Officer had observed that the assessee had incurred more than the normal sales and marketing expenses to build the “Amadeus” brand in India which was owned by Amadeus Spain. According to the Transfer 2011:DHC:6027-DB ITA 938/11 Page 3 of 20 Pricing Officer, the assessee should have been reimbursed

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. I ENERGIZER HOLDINGS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed and consequently the appeals of the revenue are liable to be dismissed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any foreign company.]” 15. A plain reading of Section indicates that it is obligatory on the part of the AO to forward a draft Assessment Order as per the provisions of Section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. I ENERGIZER HOLDINGS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed and consequently the appeals of the revenue are liable to be dismissed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any foreign company.]” 15. A plain reading of Section indicates that it is obligatory on the part of the AO to forward a draft Assessment Order as per the provisions of Section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. I ENERGIZER HOLDINGS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed and consequently the appeals of the revenue are liable to be dismissed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any foreign company.]” 15. A plain reading of Section indicates that it is obligatory on the part of the AO to forward a draft Assessment Order as per the provisions of Section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. I ENERGIZER HOLDINGS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed and consequently the appeals of the revenue are liable to be dismissed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any foreign company.]” 15. A plain reading of Section indicates that it is obligatory on the part of the AO to forward a draft Assessment Order as per the provisions of Section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S WICKWOOD DEVELOPMENT LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed and consequently the appeals of the revenue are liable to be dismissed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any foreign company.]” 15. A plain reading of Section indicates that it is obligatory on the part of the AO to forward a draft Assessment Order as per the provisions of Section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. ISERVICES INVESTMENTS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed and consequently the appeals of the revenue are liable to be dismissed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any foreign company.]” 15. A plain reading of Section indicates that it is obligatory on the part of the AO to forward a draft Assessment Order as per the provisions of Section 144C

XANDER ADVISORS INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NOIDA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed, as indicated

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Saktijit Dey

Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any non-resident not being a company, or any foreign company.” 10. On a reading of sub-section(1) of Section 144C

XANDER ADVISORS INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NOIDA

In the result, both the appeals are allowed, as indicated

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Saktijit Dey

Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92CA; and (ii) any non-resident not being a company, or any foreign company.” 10. On a reading of sub-section(1) of Section 144C

EBRO INDIA PVT.LTD. ,DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI

In the result, the ground no 4 raised by the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Accountant Member)

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and TPO has passed his order dated 25.07.2021 determining the total adjustment of Rs.141,09,056/-, which was subsequently rectified vide order dated 29.07.2021 proposing TP adjustment of Rs.16,09,038/- u/s 154 of the Act. 6. Draft assessment order u/s 144C of the Act was passed on 21.09.2021, proposing to assess the income

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. BBC WORLD INDIA (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee and the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

1) of the Act. The DRP while issuing directions under section 144C(5) of the Act did not allow reasonable opportunity to the Appellant to fight the case on merits. The directions of the DRP are erroneous and perverse on facts. Transfer Pricing

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. FOCUSOIL INC., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Dcit Vs Focusoil Inc. Central Circle-19, Room C/O. Sandeep Chilana, Advocate No. 362, Ara Centre, E-2, Chilana & Chilana Law Offices, Jhandewalan Extension, Advoate For The Respondent C- New Delhi 56, Lfg, Jangpura Extention, New Delhi-110014 Pan: Aaccf3908K Appellant Respondent

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92-CA; and(ii)any foreign company.]” 17. In the present case, the AO has not passed the draft assessment order byin compliance with provisions of section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. GYNIA HOLDING LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92-CA; and(ii)any foreign company.]” 16. In the present cases, the AO has not passed the draft assessment order by in compliance with provisions of section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. GAINWAY HOLDINGS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Dcit Gainway Holdings Ltd. Vs Central Circle-19, Room C/O. Sandeep Chilana, Advocate No. 362, Ara Centre, E-2, Chilana & Chilana Law Offices, Jhandewalan Extension, Advoate For The Respondent C- New Delhi 56, Lfg, Jangpura Extention, New Delhi-110014 Pan: Aafcg6056L Appellant Respondent

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92-CA; and(ii)any foreign company.]” 17. In the present case, the AO has not passed the draft assessment order byin compliance with provisions of section 144C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. GYNIA HOLDING LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

1) arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer passed under sub-section (3) of section 92-CA; and(ii)any foreign company.]” 16. In the present cases, the AO has not passed the draft assessment order by in compliance with provisions of section 144C