GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT E (CIRCLE), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

prices generating profits. Besides the assessee has substantial income in the nature of rental/lease/ hiring income. It is also understood that the disposal of properties by the assessee authority is by several modes including draw of lots lottery and auction. The very nature of such disposal contemplates sale to the highest bidder presumably generating profits or to unidentified persons

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE EXEMPTION, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

prices generating profits. Besides the assessee has substantial income in the nature of rental/lease/ hiring income. It is also understood that the disposal of properties by the assessee authority is by several modes including draw of lots lottery and auction. The very nature of such disposal contemplates sale to the highest bidder presumably generating profits or to unidentified persons

INCOME TAX OFFICER(E) WARD- 2(4), NEW DELHI, CIVIC CENTRE NEW DELHI vs. PRAKASH SEWA TRUST, PASCHIM VIHAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

price permissible under prevailing stamp\nduty law. The AO further observed that the entire sale consideration was given to\nother entity as donation. Accordingly, ld. CIT DR submits that assessee is not carried\nout any charitable activity nor any income was ever derived from such land which\nwas sold during the year and further entire consideration was transferred as donation

BAGHPAT BARAUT KHEKRA VIKAS PRADHIKARAN,MEERUT vs. CIT, MEERUT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: Nil Baghpat Baraut Khekra Vs. Cit, Meerut Vikas Pradhikaran, Meerut Pan: Aaalb0713B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Vinod Goel, Adv. Respondent By Sh. Sanjay Goyal, Cit(Dr)

12A of the Act, which was allowed vide order dated 30.09.2009. It is at this juncture that the first proviso and second proviso were added by the Finance Act, 2008 w.e.f. 01.04.2009, as mentioned hereinabove. Therefore, after insertion of the said proviso, any institution carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business etc. as mentioned

ADOBE SOFTWARE INDIA PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. JCIT, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh, Jm & Sh. N. K. Saini, Am Ita No. 2454/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Adobe Software India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Joint Commissioner Of Income (Now Amalgamated With Adobe Tax, Range-1, Systems India Pvt. Ltd.), Plot No. Noida 1-1A, City Centre, Sector-25A, Noida (U.P)-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacca2982J Assessee By : Sh. Deepak Chopra & Rohan Khare, Advs. Revenue By : Sh. Amrendra Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 27.10.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.01.2016 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am:

Transfer Pricing documentation requirements. 11. The learned AO/DRP has erred by rejecting certain comparable companies identified by the assessee using turnover less than Rs. 1 Crore as a comparability criterion. 12a. The learned AO/DRP has erred by rejecting certain comparable companies identified by the assessee for having different accounting year (i.e. companies having accounting year other than March

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

ANAND JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

SATISH DEV JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,FARIDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

SAJAN KUMAR JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

ANAND JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

URMILA DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri G.D.Agrawal, Before Shri G. D.Agrawal & Before Shri G. Before Shri G. D.Agrawal, D.Agrawal & Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

transferred on that day to the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner and the [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner may proceed with such applications under that sub-section from the stage at which they were on that day.] (2) Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from

HEMKUNT FOUNDATIONS,GURUGRAM vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL) -1, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed and the Stay

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2021-22 & Stay Application No.329Del/2024 ( In Ita No. 631/Del/2024 ) Assessment Year: 2021-22 Hemkunt Foundations, Vs. Principal Commissioner Plot No.809, Second Floor, Income Tax, Rd 42, Sector 42, Central-1, Gurugram, Haryana New Delhi Pin: 122 002 Pan No. Aaath8443C (Appellant) (Respondent)

transfer u/s 127. This position has been confirmed by a Constitution Bench of Supreme Court in Kashiram Aggarwala Vs UOI ((1965) 56 ITR 14 (SC). [ Attached @ S. No 3 in Revenue's Judgement PB II] D (iv) It is well-settled that non-mentioning of correct section number, or quoting wrong section number in an Order does not invalidate

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LEGACY FOOD PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

price as defined in clause (ii) of section 92F. (11) The Central Government may, after making such inquiry as it may think fit, direct, by notification in the Official Gazette, that the exemption conferred by this section shall not apply to any class of industrial undertaking or enterprise with effect from such date as it may specify in the notification

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LEGACY FOOD PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kant

price as defined in clause (ii) of section 92F. (11) The Central Government may, after making such inquiry as it may think fit, direct, by notification in the Official Gazette, that the exemption conferred by this section shall not apply to any class of industrial undertaking or enterprise with effect from such date as it may specify in the notification

MICRO FINANCE INDUSTRY NETWORK,GURGAON vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

pricing\nand what factors do they consider in choosing\na credit product. To bridge these knowledge\ngaps and understand customers' thoughts and\nperspectives on these issues, customers who\ncalled on MFIN CGRM were surveyed.\nCentre meeting: There has been increasing\nfeedback about the dilution in the culture of\ncentre meetings. Delinquencies arising from\nthe demonetization phase and now Covid

BSC C&C JOINT VENTURE,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI G.S. PANNU (Vice President), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

transfer pricing adjustment on account of interest on advance. The Ld. Assessing Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi proceeded to frame draft order under section 144C of the Act dated 25.09.2021. He computed the total income of the assessee at Rs. 30,92,31,440/- as under:- Total income as per return Rs. (-) 3,56,94,313/- Add: Adjustment