BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

574 results for “transfer pricing”+ Reassessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi574Mumbai435Chennai156Bangalore125Hyderabad120Jaipur103Ahmedabad71Chandigarh65Kolkata56Pune30Rajkot30Indore29Raipur29Agra21Surat20Guwahati19Nagpur17Jodhpur16Lucknow12Cochin10Dehradun9Cuttack9Amritsar6Patna5Visakhapatnam2Panaji1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)66Addition to Income59Section 153A48Section 14746Section 144C43Section 6839Section 14837Section 15333Reassessment28Limitation/Time-bar

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/938/2011HC Delhi28 Nov 2011
For Appellant: Ms Suruchi AggarwalFor Respondent: Mr M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mayank Nagi &
Section 144CSection 260ASection 92BSection 92CSection 92E

reassessment or recomputation or fresh assessment, as the case may be, expires.] [(4) On receipt of the order under sub-section (3), the Assessing Officer shall proceed to compute the total income of the assessee under sub-section (4) of section 92C in conformity with the arm’s length price as so determined by the Transfer

(Now known as Sony India Limited)

Showing 1–20 of 574 · Page 1 of 29

...
25
Section 26322
Disallowance14
ITA/16/2014HC Delhi16 Mar 2015

Transfer Pricing Officer during the course of the proceeding before him, the provisions of this Chapter shall apply as if such transaction is an international transaction referred to him under sub-section (1). ###(2C) Nothing contained in sub-section (2B) shall empower the Assessing Officer either to assess or reassess

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 7460/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWERE IRELAND LIMITED,DUBLIN 24, IRELAND vs. DCIT CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION , NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 1979/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5025/DEL/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 7922/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 1978/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5027/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5028/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5026/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 3080/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 3079/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,DUBLIN, IRELAND vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 55/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5024/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4921/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), NEW DELHI vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD., DUBLIN, IRELAND

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 5029/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4922/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LTD.,IRELAND vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals by the assessee stand allowed in terms of the above order and the Revenue’s appeal stand dismissed as above

ITA 4923/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg

Section 9(1)(vi)

reassessment orders passed by the Ld. AO after the pronouncement of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited (supra) i.e. for AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, AY 2018-19, AY 2019- 20 and AY 2020-21, the Ld. AO has not alleged that the receipts

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 vs. HEADSTRONG SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.

ITA/77/2019HC Delhi24 Dec 2020
Section 10ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)

Transfer Pricing Officer before the said date, or a reference under subsection (1) is made on or after the 1st day of June, 2007, an order under sub-section (3) may be made at any time before sixty days prior to the date on which the period of limitation referred to in section 153, or as the case

RAMPGREEN SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed

ITA/102/2015HC Delhi10 Aug 2015

Bench: The Tribunal, Impugning The Assessment Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Hereafter ‘Ao’) Making The Transfer Pricing Adjustments (Hereafter ‘Tp Adjustments’) In Respect Of The Assessment Year (Hereafter ‘Ay’) 2008-09 As Finalised By The Transfer Pricing Officer 2015:Dhc:6421-Db

Section 260A

transfer of income to a jurisdiction outside India, if any, in respect of the controlled transactions. 15. The exercise of determining the ALP in respect of international transactions between the related enterprises is aimed to determine the price, which would have been charged for products and services, as nearly as possible, in case such international transactions were not controlled