Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3,314 results for “section 68”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,658 Delhi3,314 Kolkata1,559 Ahmedabad881 Chennai847 Jaipur725 Bangalore580 Surat522 Hyderabad511 Indore358 Chandigarh318 Pune305 Rajkot261 Cochin213 Raipur182 Nagpur166 Visakhapatnam157 Lucknow125 Amritsar121 Guwahati103 Agra88 Calcutta77 Cuttack65 Allahabad62 Patna57 Jodhpur54 Panaji42 Ranchi40 Dehradun31 Jabalpur23 Karnataka21 Telangana16 Varanasi14 SC9 Rajasthan4 Gauhati2 Punjab & Haryana1 Orissa1 Kerala1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 68131 Addition to Income87 Section 14761 Section 153A55 Section 143(3)46 Section 14845 Search & Seizure34 Section 153C33 Section 13233 Unexplained Cash Credit

RUBY SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2881/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

RUBY SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

Showing 1–20 of 3,314 · Page 1 of 166

...

30

Section 143(2)28

Reopening of Assessment20

ITA 2880/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

RUBY SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2879/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

RUBY SINGH ,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2876/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

RUBY SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2877/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

RUBY SINGH,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2875/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

RUBY SINGH ,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the seven captioned appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2878/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri M. Balaganesh, Accoutant Member

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Act read with section 115BBE of the Act. 5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NOIDA vs. AASHIKYANA CIVIL CONTRACTORS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 9025/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Kanv Bali, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 250(4)Section 68

unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 only by relying upon credit entries and completely

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. ELATIVE BUILDING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2498/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh, Sr. DR

unexplained cash credits within the meaning of section 68 of the 7 Income Tax Act, 1961 presuming this to be unexplained

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 on the ground that appellant had failed to discharge the onus cast on it at mandated by the said section