BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9,292 results for “section 68”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi9,292Mumbai7,835Bangalore2,363Kolkata2,253Ahmedabad1,805Chennai1,798Jaipur1,362Hyderabad1,285Pune1,166Surat822Chandigarh805Karnataka775Indore738Cochin529Raipur437Rajkot403Visakhapatnam384Nagpur247Amritsar244Lucknow217Cuttack215Agra215Guwahati192Telangana151Jodhpur120SC115Ranchi112Jabalpur104Patna101Calcutta96Allahabad94Panaji89Dehradun79Varanasi35Rajasthan22Kerala13Orissa10A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Uttarakhand3Gauhati3Punjab & Haryana3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Tripura1Himachal Pradesh1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1Andhra Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Addition to Income81Section 6870Section 143(3)59Section 153A57Section 153C50Disallowance40Section 14A36Section 153D27Section 13225Section 148

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

Showing 1–20 of 9,292 · Page 1 of 465

...
23
Deduction20
Search & Seizure19

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 6401/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 5974/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2920/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 509/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STAR LIGHT CONSUMER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 6070/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ASIA SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD. vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA-131/2003HC Delhi31 Jan 2011
Section 195Section 234BSection 260ASection 9(1)Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

68. We are inclined to agree with the argument of the learned Senior counsel for the appellant that in the present case, control of the satellite or the transponder always remains with the appellant. We may also observe at this stage that the terms ―lease of transponder capacity‖, ―lessor‖, ―lessee‖ and ―rental‖ used in the agreement would