Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9,292 results for “section 68”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi9,292 Mumbai7,835 Bangalore2,363 Kolkata2,253 Ahmedabad1,805 Chennai1,798 Jaipur1,362 Hyderabad1,285 Pune1,166 Surat822 Chandigarh805 Karnataka775 Indore738 Cochin529 Raipur437 Rajkot403 Visakhapatnam384 Nagpur247 Amritsar244 Lucknow217 Cuttack215 Agra215 Guwahati192 Telangana151 Jodhpur120 SC115 Ranchi112 Jabalpur104 Patna101 Calcutta96 Allahabad94 Panaji89 Dehradun79 Varanasi35 Rajasthan22 Kerala13 Orissa10 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4 Uttarakhand3 Gauhati3 Punjab & Haryana3 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Tripura1 Himachal Pradesh1 HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1 Andhra Pradesh1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Addition to Income81 Section 6870 Section 143(3)59 Section 153A57 Section 153C50 Disallowance40 Section 14A36 Section 153D27 Section 13225 Section 148

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

Showing 1–20 of 9,292 · Page 1 of 465

...

23

Search & Seizure19

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 6401/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 5974/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2920/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 509/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STAR LIGHT CONSUMER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 6070/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 2,60,00,000 9. Sintex Consumer Electronics Pvt. 25.03.20 2012- 143(3) 26.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 78,22,80,000 4,026/- - Share

ASIA SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. LTD. vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA-131/2003HC Delhi31 Jan 2011

Section 195Section 234BSection 260ASection 9(1)Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

68. We are inclined to agree with the argument of the learned Senior counsel for the appellant that in the present case, control of the satellite or the transponder always remains with the appellant. We may also observe at this stage that the terms ―lease of transponder capacity‖, ―lessor‖, ―lessee‖ and ―rental‖ used in the agreement would