BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 88Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai17Kolkata8Ahmedabad7Delhi4

Key Topics

Section 88E18Section 115J18Section 2636Section 143(3)4Section 260A2Section 872Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)2Business Income2Deduction2Limitation/Time-bar2Revision u/s 2632

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - II vs. M/S MBL & Co. LTD

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/573/2012HC Delhi17 May 2013
For Appellant: Mr N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing CounselFor Respondent: Mr Salil Aggarwal, Mr Ajay Wadhwa and
Section 115JSection 260ASection 87Section 88E

88E of the Act would not be available against the tax as computed under Section 115JB of the Act. The Tribunal held that Section 87 of the Act did not differentiate between the total income computed under the regular provisions or as calculated under Section 115JB of the Act. Section 115JB only provides for an alternative

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - II vs. M/S MBL & Co. LTD

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/1181/2011HC Delhi17 May 2013
For Appellant: Mr N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing CounselFor Respondent: Mr Salil Aggarwal, Mr Ajay Wadhwa and
Section 115JSection 260ASection 87Section 88E

88E of the Act would not be available against the tax as computed under Section 115JB of the Act. The Tribunal held that Section 87 of the Act did not differentiate between the total income computed under the regular provisions or as calculated under Section 115JB of the Act. Section 115JB only provides for an alternative

AMBIENCE DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), DELHI-2 JHANDEWALAN, NEW DELHI, DELHI

ITA 1868/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Sh. Mahesh Kumar CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

68,61,227/ as deductible business expenses i.e. difference between statutory deduction and the allowable expenses to tune of Rs. 44,12,78,910/-. In this connection, we would like to state that the said proposition will actually result in the loss of revenue because in such case the assessee will also be entitled to depreciation allowance amounting to Rs.60

AMBIENCE DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. PCIT (CENTRAL) DELHI-2, JHANDEWALAN NEW DELHI, DELHI

ITA 1869/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Sh. Mahesh Kumar CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mahesh Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

68,61,227/ as deductible business expenses i.e. difference between statutory deduction and the allowable expenses to tune of Rs. 44,12,78,910/-. In this connection, we would like to state that the said proposition will actually result in the loss of revenue because in such case the assessee will also be entitled to depreciation allowance amounting to Rs.60