SHAIKSHANIK KEISHANK SAMAJ,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, GHAZIABAD
In the result, all the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 650/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2019AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Singhal, CA &For Respondent: Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 115BSection 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 68
75,000
No details and evidence
12. 13. Pushpa Singh
49,000
No details and evidence
14. Smt. Usha Devi
94,500
No details and evidence
Total
16,16,500/-
Aggrieved with the order of the ld. CIT (A) the assessee is before us.
8. During the arguments, the ld. AR mainly argued that Section 68
