Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

934 results for “section 68”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,418 Delhi934 Jaipur342 Kolkata247 Chandigarh156 Bangalore146 Chennai143 Ahmedabad138 Indore115 Hyderabad111 Surat107 Pune97 Visakhapatnam60 Rajkot51 Raipur43 Lucknow37 Guwahati31 Nagpur28 Agra25 Cochin23 Jodhpur20 Amritsar19 Ranchi16 Jabalpur7 Dehradun6 Cuttack5 Calcutta5 Allahabad4 SC4 Karnataka4 Varanasi3 Patna3 Panaji1 Kerala1 Telangana1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 68130 Addition to Income88 Section 69C87 Section 14778 Section 153A67 Section 143(3)41 Search & Seizure40 Section 13238 Section 69A33 Section 148

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 6401/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 5974/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 934 · Page 1 of 47

...

32

Unexplained Cash Credit15

ITA 2920/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STAR LIGHT CONSUMER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 6070/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 509/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 31,00,00,000 69,015/- - 7,75,000 Unexplained expenses (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C

ALEXIS GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), DELHI, DELHI

ITA 2497/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR (Judicial Member)

Section 143(2)Section 194CSection 69C

69C is confined to a situation where source of expenditure incurred could not be objectively explained to the satisfaction of the AO. In the instant case, what being disallowed is the expenditure incurred and not the source of payment towards such expenditure. Neither Section 68