BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

740 results for “section 68”+ Section 69Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi740Mumbai700Jaipur349Ahmedabad306Bangalore223Chennai209Hyderabad164Chandigarh147Surat121Pune116Kolkata115Indore103Cochin91Rajkot90Lucknow56Amritsar51Nagpur48Visakhapatnam40Raipur36Agra35Patna28Jodhpur28Guwahati25Ranchi19Allahabad18Cuttack16Jabalpur10Varanasi6Panaji5Dehradun5SC3Karnataka3Rajasthan1Kerala1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 153A125Addition to Income90Section 69A85Section 6874Section 14753Section 13251Search & Seizure44Section 153C31Section 143(3)30Section 143(2)

SACHIN MUTREJA,GURGOAN vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4954/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SACHIN MUTREJA,GURGOAN vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 740 · Page 1 of 37

...
28
Cash Deposit20
Unexplained Investment12

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4956/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT(OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5101/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT(OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5104/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SACHIN MUTREJA,GURGOAN vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4953/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SACHIN MUTREJA,GURGOAN vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4957/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SACHIN MUTREJA,GURGOAN vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4952/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT(OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5102/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT(OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5100/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT (OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5099/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT (OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5098/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SACHIN MUTREJA,HARYANA vs. JCIT (OSD), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4955/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SAMEER MUTREJA,GURGAON vs. JCIT(OSD), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5103/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

SACHIN MUTREJA,HARYANA vs. JCIT(OSD), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4951/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pravin Rawal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 147Section 69A

section 69A of the Act on account of cash generated through bogus purchase and purportedly handed over to Mutreja Brothers for their personal use and enrichment. 44. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We find that in the assessment order, it has been alleged that M/s SALT, M/s Scoop and M/s Dream

WEL INTERTRADE (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 27(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is accordingly allowed

ITA 7167/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. N. K. Billaiya & Sh. K. N. Charyita No:-7167/Del/2018 (Assessment Year: 2013-14)

For Appellant: Sh. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Abhishek Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 115Section 115BSection 139Section 143Section 154Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69C

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69 D and reflected

PRADEEP TYAGI HUF,HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1),FARIDABAD, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1933/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy[Assessment Year 2017-18]

Section 115BSection 44ASection 80C

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D, the income-tax payable

J. M. HOUSING LIMITED,DELHI vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL) KNP MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 8248/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member [Assessment Year: 2021-22] J.M. Housing Limited, Pr.Cit (Central) Kanpur, At Meerut, 312/3T/F5 Pratap Bhawan, Aayakar Bhawan, Bhainsali Ground, Bhahadur Shah Zafar Marg, Vs Meerut, Uttar Pradesh-25001 Central Delhi, Delhi-11002 Pan-Aaccj1692E Assessee Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271ASection 68

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C, section 69D and reflected in the return

DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI vs. BAWA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 352/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.352/Del/2021 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2017-18 बनाम Dcit Bawa Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Circle 4(2) Vs. A-24, Tagore Market, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi. West, New Delhi. Pan No. Aaacb4823D अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 68

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C and section 69D of the Act and are subject

RAVINDER BAWEJA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 36(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, these appeals are allowed as indicated above for

ITA 2254/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Pareek

For Appellant: Shri Rikky Dua, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D of IT Act. Section

RAVINDER BAWEJA,DELHI vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, NEW DELHI

In the result, these appeals are allowed as indicated above for

ITA 1731/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Pareek

For Appellant: Shri Rikky Dua, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D of IT Act. Section