Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11,038 results for “section 68”+ Section 68clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi11,038 Mumbai9,790 Kolkata3,253 Bangalore2,602 Ahmedabad2,259 Chennai2,209 Jaipur1,576 Hyderabad1,447 Pune1,342 Surat963 Chandigarh908 Indore843 Karnataka811 Cochin642 Rajkot503 Raipur460 Visakhapatnam423 Lucknow322 Nagpur300 Amritsar274 Agra260 Cuttack244 Guwahati236 Calcutta180 Telangana168 Patna161 Ranchi152 Jodhpur148 SC132 Jabalpur120 Panaji109 Dehradun108 Allahabad104 Varanasi50 Rajasthan22 Orissa15 Kerala13 Punjab & Haryana7 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 Uttarakhand4 Gauhati3 Andhra Pradesh2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Himachal Pradesh1 Tripura1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Section 68101 Addition to Income83 Section 14764 Section 14844 Disallowance38 Section 143(3)35 Section 26332 Section 153A26 Deduction22 Section 143(2)

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 509/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Showing 1–20 of 11,038 · Page 1 of 552

...

15

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STAR LIGHT CONSUMER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 6070/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 5974/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2920/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 6401/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 10,00,00,000 (-) - Advance – section 68 66,56,47,519 3,80,468/- - 50% disallowance

SHAIKSHANIK KEISHANK SAMAJ,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 650/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Singhal, CA &For Respondent: Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR

Section 11Section 115BSection 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 68

section 68, he referred to the combination of section 68 and section 115BBC of the IT Act. It is once