HOPEWIN ADMARK & CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal is allowed partly for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. I.C. Sudhir & Sh. O.P. Kant

68 : Rs.12,40,000/- 3. On account of addition in Assets, : Rs.1,13,430/- 4. On account of bogus sundry creditors; : Rs.14,05,625/- The a/cs of Sundry Debtors and Sundry Creditors were not proved beyond doubt. The balances of Sundry Debtors and Sr Creditors have been Carried forward to the A.Y. 2000-01, There is increase in investment from

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SMT. PREM ANAND, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed