Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

471 results for “section 68”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi471 Mumbai445 Kolkata203 Ahmedabad134 Chennai132 Bangalore122 Pune68 Jaipur68 Agra67 Hyderabad56 Raipur50 Visakhapatnam40 Cuttack31 Lucknow29 Cochin22 Chandigarh21 Indore17 Surat16 Nagpur11 Rajkot10 Guwahati10 Jodhpur8 Allahabad6 Varanasi6 Jabalpur5 SC3 Ranchi3 Karnataka3 Amritsar2 Dehradun2 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)49 Disallowance41 Section 143(1)39 Section 43B38 Addition to Income30 Deduction28 Section 143(3)18 Section 139(1)14 Section 92C12 Section 36

FARIDABAD SERVICE STATION,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-30(4), DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1472/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

FLYING FABRICATION,NEW DELHI vs. ITO,WARD 1(4), GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1545/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi

Showing 1–20 of 471 · Page 1 of 24

...

12

Transfer Pricing8

28 Jul 2022

AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Flying Fabrication, Vs. Income Tax Officer, The Tax Chambers Advocates Ward-1(4) & Legal Advisors, C-177, Gurgaon Defence Colony, Lgf, New Delhi Pan :Aadff9825H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

ASHIRWAD CARBONICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMTIED,NEW DELHI vs. CIRCLE-3(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1721/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

RSG SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-20(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 1478/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Sept 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasaddr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Soni, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT(DR) and Ms. Rajeshjwari R., JCIT, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

VHS ENTERPRISES ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-29(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1675/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K. Billaiya

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

VHS ENTERPRISES,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-29(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1676/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K. Billaiya

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

PUSHPA SHARMA,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1473/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139(1)Section 3Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

RAMA ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ,MEERUT vs. ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), MEERUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1477/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139(1)Section 3Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

UTTAM INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-25(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1911/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

TRUTECH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1913/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

TRUTUFF FACILITY MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1851/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

VIKAS PUBLISHING HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BENGALURU

ITA 1772/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

TECH AUTO PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1831/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

TOSHIBA WATER SOLUTIONS & SERVICES PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-27(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 1754/DEL/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

RAJAN BANQUET PVT.LTD.,MORADABAD vs. ACIT-1, MORADABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1427/DEL/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Aug 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

RAVINDRA NATH SAHNI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CPC, NEW DELHI

ITA 1784/DEL/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jul 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1784/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Ravindra Nath Saini, Vs Acit, 51, Pashim Marg, Vsant Vihar, Cpc, New Delhi-110057 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Abjps2875D Assessee By : Sh. A. K. Batra, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Shankar Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Batra, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Shankar Gupta, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

STEEL BIRD INTERNATIONAL,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, RANGE- 63, NEW DELHI

ITA 1573/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharmaita No. 1573/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Steel Bird International, Vs Jcit, 2E/3, Jhandewalan Extn., Range-63, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabfs7296K Assessee By : Sh. Vikas Katyal, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Shashi Kajle, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.05.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Vikas Katyal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Shashi Kajle, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

ORIENT CRAFT LTD. ,DELHI vs. ASST. DIT, CPC , BANGALORE

ITA 477/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharmaita No. 477/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Orient Craft Ltd., Vs Asstt. Dit, C/O M/S Rra Taxindia, Cpc, D-28, South Extension, Bangalore Part-I, New Delhi-110049 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco0068M Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Rinku Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 05.05.2022

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Rinku Singh, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

APEX INSURANCE CONSULTANT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD -3(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 4748/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasaddr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4748/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Apex Insurance Consultant Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer, 54, Basement Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Ward-3(1), Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaeca3234H Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. Kanav Bali, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 08.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 12.09.2022

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Kanav Bali, CIT DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee

MAGIC AUTO PVT. LTD. ,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE 13 , DELHI

ITA 27/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. A. D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 27/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Magic Auto Pvt. Ltd., Vs Adit, 7/56, Desh Bandhu Gupta Cpc, Road, Karol Bagh, Central Delhi, Delhi-110005 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm4873C Assessee By : Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.06.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt aggrieved by this assessment order, the assessee