Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4,001 results for “section 68”+ Section 42clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,001 Mumbai3,069 Bangalore1,196 Chennai841 Ahmedabad790 Kolkata733 Karnataka666 Hyderabad628 Jaipur591 Indore385 Pune374 Chandigarh318 Surat300 Raipur219 Cochin205 Rajkot149 Visakhapatnam146 Nagpur114 Agra109 Cuttack97 Telangana93 Guwahati83 Lucknow82 Amritsar80 Calcutta67 Jabalpur66 Allahabad64 SC57 Ranchi51 Jodhpur32 Dehradun27 Patna16 Varanasi15 Rajasthan13 Orissa10 Kerala7 Panaji4 Uttarakhand4 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 Andhra Pradesh1 Punjab & Haryana1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income74 Section 153A64 Section 6845 Section 14736 Section 143(3)36 Section 69A26 Section 13225 Search & Seizure24 Section 14820 Disallowance

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

Showing 1–20 of 4,001 · Page 1 of 201

...

18

Section 143(2)16

Natural Justice11

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 6401/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STAR LIGHT CONSUMER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 6070/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2920/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 5974/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 509/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 15 13 42,25,00,000 4,840/- 16. Supreme Placement Services Pvt. 27.03.20 2012- 143(3) 29.09.2012 Ltd. 15 13 72,43,00,000 9,73,438/- - Share

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-2 vs. M/S BOSE CORPORATION (INDIA) PVT. L TO.

The appeal is allowed to the above extent

ITA/462/2016HC Delhi23 Aug 2016

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

Section 21Section 23Section 28

42 of 57 65. In the said case, two persons – one of whom happened to be E. Micheal Raj – were arrested on the ground that they were carrying 4.07 kg of heroin. Two samples, of 5 grams each, were retrieved from the said quantity and subjected to test. The purities of heroin in the said two samples were found