BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10,779 results for “section 68”+ Section 4clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi10,779Mumbai9,498Kolkata3,158Bangalore2,562Ahmedabad2,218Chennai2,144Jaipur1,527Hyderabad1,402Pune1,328Surat944Chandigarh900Karnataka808Indore806Cochin641Rajkot470Raipur460Visakhapatnam400Lucknow310Nagpur276Amritsar272Agra251Cuttack242Guwahati234Telangana165Ranchi153Calcutta152Patna147Jodhpur140SC130Jabalpur120Panaji109Dehradun105Allahabad104Varanasi50Rajasthan22Orissa13Kerala13Punjab & Haryana6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5Uttarakhand4Gauhati3Andhra Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Himachal Pradesh1Tripura1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Section 6895Addition to Income87Section 153A64Section 143(3)55Section 14852Section 14737Section 153D31Section 153C30Section 143(2)27Natural Justice

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5650/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

ITA 4691/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

Showing 1–20 of 10,779 · Page 1 of 539

...
19
Disallowance17
Deduction15

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 9287/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9357/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

ITA 5740/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STAR LIGHT CONSUMER ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 6070/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5741/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 509/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5527/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

ITA 5397/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 5974/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 510/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2920/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5832/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 5831/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 6401/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

ITA 5742/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

ITA 5736/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 5744/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4

LAKHMI CHAND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT CENTRAL 3, NEW DELHI

ITA 1803/DEL/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Ms.Madhumita Roylakhmi Chand Vs. Principal Commissioner Charitable Society, Of Income Tax, Central-3 Elephanta Lane, Behind Room No. 325, 3Rd Floor, Sector-10/6 Market, New Income Tax Building, E-3 Golak Dham, Sector-10, Ara Centre, Jhandewalan Dwarka, Extension, New Delhi - 110075 New Delhi - 110055

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr.AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 127(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 246ASection 80G

4) claiming and Union Territory exemption under of Chandigarh Clauses (21), (22), (22A), (22B) (23), (23A) (23AAA), (23B), (23C), (23F), (23FA), (24), (46) and (47) of Section 10, Section 11, Section 12, Section 13A and section 13B of the Income tax Act, 1961 and assessed or assessable by an Income-tax authority at Serial Number