Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4,727 results for “section 68”+ Section 36(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,727 Mumbai3,869 Bangalore1,378 Chennai987 Ahmedabad961 Kolkata915 Jaipur839 Karnataka680 Hyderabad672 Pune449 Indore446 Chandigarh419 Surat327 Cochin264 Raipur208 Visakhapatnam189 Rajkot163 Nagpur147 Lucknow128 Agra125 Telangana105 Cuttack104 Guwahati100 Amritsar96 Ranchi76 Jabalpur75 Calcutta66 SC63 Jodhpur60 Allahabad56 Patna39 Panaji33 Dehradun28 Varanasi27 Rajasthan11 Orissa10 Kerala7 Uttarakhand3 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 Andhra Pradesh1 Tripura1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 14A44 Addition to Income40 Section 153A39 Section 153C33 Section 143(3)32 Section 6825 Disallowance19 Section 10(38)16 Section 143(2)15 Section 147

RSG SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-20(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 1478/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Sept 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasaddr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Soni, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT(DR) and Ms. Rajeshjwari R., JCIT, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

APEX INSURANCE CONSULTANT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD -3(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 4748/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 4,727 · Page 1 of 237

...

14

Search & Seizure14

Undisclosed Income8

ITAT Delhi

12 Sept 2022

AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasaddr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4748/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Apex Insurance Consultant Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer, 54, Basement Vinoba Puri, Lajpat Ward-3(1), Nagar-Ii, New Delhi-110024 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaeca3234H Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. Kanav Bali, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 08.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 12.09.2022

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Kanav Bali, CIT DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

SONA FASHIONS INC,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-29(5), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1217/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Memberassessment Year: 2018-19 Sona Fashions Inc. Vs. Ito, H 9, Mohan Coop. Industrial Ward-29(5), Estate, B1, Mathura Road, New Delhi South Delhi, New Delhi Pan :Aacfs7353L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

RAJAN BANQUET PVT.LTD.,MORADABAD vs. ACIT-1, MORADABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1427/DEL/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Aug 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

UTTAM INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-25(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1911/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

VIKAS PUBLISHING HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BENGALURU

ITA 1772/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

TECH AUTO PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1831/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

TRUTUFF FACILITY MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1851/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

TOSHIBA WATER SOLUTIONS & SERVICES PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-27(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 1754/DEL/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

TRUTECH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1913/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

HANS RUBBER & SPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,MEERUT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, MEERUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 915/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

PUSHPA SHARMA,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1473/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139(1)Section 3Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

RAMA ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ,MEERUT vs. ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), MEERUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1477/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139(1)Section 3Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

FLYING FABRICATION,NEW DELHI vs. ITO,WARD 1(4), GURGAON

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1545/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Flying Fabrication, Vs. Income Tax Officer, The Tax Chambers Advocates Ward-1(4) & Legal Advisors, C-177, Gurgaon Defence Colony, Lgf, New Delhi Pan :Aadff9825H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

FARIDABAD SERVICE STATION,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD-30(4), DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1472/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

RAVINDRA NATH SAHNI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CPC, NEW DELHI

ITA 1784/DEL/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jul 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1784/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Ravindra Nath Saini, Vs Acit, 51, Pashim Marg, Vsant Vihar, Cpc, New Delhi-110057 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Abjps2875D Assessee By : Sh. A. K. Batra, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Shankar Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.07.2022

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Batra, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Shankar Gupta, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

MAGIC AUTO PVT. LTD. ,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE 13 , DELHI

ITA 27/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. A. D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 27/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Magic Auto Pvt. Ltd., Vs Adit, 7/56, Desh Bandhu Gupta Cpc, Road, Karol Bagh, Central Delhi, Delhi-110005 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm4873C Assessee By : Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.06.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

UNITED COFFEE HOUSE,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-52(4), DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 792/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Delhi08 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2019-20 M/S. United Coffee House, Vs. Income Tax Officer, E-15, Connaught Place, Ward-52(4), Delhi Delhi Pan :Aaafu1260G (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

ASHIRWAD CARBONICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMTIED,NEW DELHI vs. CIRCLE-3(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1721/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt

STEEL BIRD INTERNATIONAL,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, RANGE- 63, NEW DELHI

ITA 1573/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharmaita No. 1573/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Steel Bird International, Vs Jcit, 2E/3, Jhandewalan Extn., Range-63, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabfs7296K Assessee By : Sh. Vikas Katyal, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Shashi Kajle, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.05.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Vikas Katyal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Shashi Kajle, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 36(1)(va) of the Act and Rs. 30,68,583 being employers' contribution under section 43B of the Act. Felt