JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following its earlier order dated 23rd March 1999 for AY 1994-95 and order dated 29th December 1999 for A. Y. 1995-96 in AY, held that Section 43B does not apply. 74. The ITAT followed its order dated 8th August

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following its earlier order dated 23rd March 1999 for AY 1994-95 and order dated 29th December 1999 for A. Y. 1995-96 in AY, held that Section 43B does not apply. 74. The ITAT followed its order dated 8th August

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following its earlier order dated 23rd March 1999 for AY 1994-95 and order dated 29th December 1999 for A. Y. 1995-96 in AY, held that Section 43B does not apply. 74. The ITAT followed its order dated 8th August

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. JET LITE (INDIA) LTD.

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following its earlier order dated 23rd March 1999 for AY 1994-95 and order dated 29th December 1999 for A. Y. 1995-96 in AY, held that Section 43B does not apply. 74. The ITAT followed its order dated 8th August

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following its earlier order dated 23rd March 1999 for AY 1994-95 and order dated 29th December 1999 for A. Y. 1995-96 in AY, held that Section 43B does not apply. 74. The ITAT followed its order dated 8th August

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI

The appeals are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to

35B and added the said amount back to the income of the Assessee. The CIT (A), following its earlier order dated 23rd March 1999 for AY 1994-95 and order dated 29th December 1999 for A. Y. 1995-96 in AY, held that Section 43B does not apply. 74. The ITAT followed its order dated 8th August

M/S. KRISHAK BHARTI COOPERATIVE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

35B etc. Even in Chapter VI, deductions for set off or carry forward of loss is allowed. Fourthly and lastly, certain deductions were permissible under Chapter VII and Chapter VIII and which had been substantial or partly replaced and were placed under Chapter VIA. These were deductions which were reduced from the income computed in accordance with the earlier provisions/Chapters

M/S. KRISHAK BHARTI COOPERATIVE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

35B etc. Even in Chapter VI, deductions for set off or carry forward of loss is allowed. Fourthly and lastly, certain deductions were permissible under Chapter VII and Chapter VIII and which had been substantial or partly replaced and were placed under Chapter VIA. These were deductions which were reduced from the income computed in accordance with the earlier provisions/Chapters

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

35B etc. Even in Chapter VI, deductions for set off or carry forward of loss is allowed. Fourthly and lastly, certain deductions were permissible under Chapter VII and Chapter VIII and which had been substantial or partly replaced and were placed under Chapter VIA. These were deductions which were reduced from the income computed in accordance with the earlier provisions/Chapters

ACIT,, NEW DELHI vs. M/S KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Kul Bharat

35B etc. Even in Chapter VI, deductions for set off or carry forward of loss is allowed. Fourthly and lastly, certain deductions were permissible under Chapter VII and Chapter VIII and which had been substantial or partly replaced and were placed under Chapter VIA. These were deductions which were reduced from the income computed in accordance with the earlier provisions/Chapters