BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 272Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka21Chennai12Mumbai11Delhi2Indore2Jaipur1Nagpur1Pune1SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)7Section 1476Section 2744Section 143(3)3Section 271(1)(c)3Section 2723Section 1442Section 272B2Addition to Income2

INDIAN CLOTHING LEAGUE(P) LTD.,NOIDA vs. ITO, WARD-26(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 505/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2011-12 Indian Clothing League (P) Ltd., Vs. Ito, Rupinder Kumar Aggarwal, Ward-26(2), Advocate, B-1A/22H, New Delhi. Sector-51, Noida. Pan: Aaccv3439R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Lalit Mohan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Om Parkash, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2022 Order

For Appellant: Shri Lalit Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Om Parkash, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

68 of the Act. 8 4.7 That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has also failed to appreciate that the books of account in respect of which alleged sum of Rs. 25,00,000/-was credited did not belong to the appellant. 4.8 That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has failed to appreciate that since appellant

RAM NARAYAN CONTRACTOR,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-62(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 957/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2023AY 2014-15
Section 129Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 272Section 272BSection 274

68,351/- and Salary to Partner of Rs.59,94,429/- not allowed as assessment has been made u/s 144 (actually it was made u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961). -On addition in net profit of a firm made by estimating profit as 5% of turnover instead of 3.86% declared by 'A'. And such prayer