Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin155 Indore107 Bangalore91 Chennai24 Karnataka21 Rajkot4 Nagpur4 Ahmedabad3 Delhi3 Jaipur2 Mumbai2 Agra2

Key Topics

Section 234E17 Section 194I6 Section 2016 Section 200(3)3 TDS3 Section 278B2 Section 200A2 Section 1942 Section 220(2)2

TECHMOBIA DIGITAL SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-76(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1853/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Shri Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR

Section 194ISection 200(3)Section 201Section 23Section 234ESection 246

68 ITD 390 (Mumbai). The object of introducing section 234E to curb a situation where tax was used to be deducted

MEGHNA GUPTA,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT, CPC- TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2649/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Oct 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sujit Kumar, Sr. DR

Section 194Section 194ISection 200ASection 201Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234E

68 ITD 390 (Mumbai). The object of introducing section 234E to curb a situation where tax was used to be deducted

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 DELHI vs. ALCHEMIST CAPITAL LTD

ITA/289/2022HC Delhi30 Aug 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Section 278Section 278BSection 313

68,78,256/-, ₹1,59,72,437/-, and ₹2,01,34,235/- respectively—were deducted by the respondents but not deposited with the Government treasury within the stipulated time. 14. He submitted that the prosecution was sanctioned after due consideration of the respondents’ replies, which sought to justify Signed By:HARMINDER KAUR Signing Date:27.05.2025 18:13:49 Signature