568 results for “section 68”+ Section 221(1)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 568 · Page 1 of 29
Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi
1 The appellant company has (SC) not given any cogent • CIT V Lachhman Das Oswal reasoning for the fund (1980) 126 ITR 446 (P&H) flow. Appellant company • CIT V Hero Cycles Ltd&Ors is only routing (1997) 228 ITR 463 (SC) transactions of alleged • CIT V Stepwell Industries Bhushan Steel Ltd. and not Limited &Ors (1997) 228 the ultimate