KAMLESH RANI,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-39(1), NEW DELHI
In the result, all the 03 appeals of the assessees are partly allowed
ITA 8218/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Mar 2019AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuay: 2014-15 Smt. Kamlesh Rani, Vs. Ito, Ward 39(1), C/O Kapil Goel, Advocate, New Delhi F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi (Pan: Alpr0483C) (Appellant) (Respondent) Ay: 2014-15 Vishal Kashyap, Vs. Ito, Ward 39(1), C/O Kapil Goel, Advocate, New Delhi F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi (Pan: Bmypk9851L) (Appellant) (Respondent) Ay: 2014-15 Prem Rattan Gupta, Vs. Ito, Ward 39(1), C/O Kapil Goel, Advocate, New Delhi F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi (Pan: Aaepg5856G) (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Sh. Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Section 10(38)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 68Section 69C
section 68 of the Act has been held can’t be applicable
to mere share sale which is not akin to receipt of gift, loan, share capital, advance
etc is view of:
The Hon’ble Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ITO vs Jatin Investment Pvt. Ltd. In ITA No.4325 &
4326/Kol/2009 order dated 27.05.2015 held