BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 167Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai13Pune5Chandigarh3Delhi3Hyderabad3Bangalore2Panaji2Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 685Addition to Income3Section 12A2Section 112Section 153C2Section 2542Disallowance2Natural Justice2

SHAIKSHANIK KEISHANK SAMAJ,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 650/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2019AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Singhal, CA &For Respondent: Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 115BSection 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250Section 68

68 are not applicable. Further, the AO has not pointed out in the assessment order that provisions of section 115BBC are applicable to make addition in the case of the appellant. 15 Shaikshanik Krishank Samaj 6. The Ld. Assessing Officer has considered the assessee society an Association of Person within the meaning of section 167B

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-06, NEW DELHI vs. SAD BHAWNA, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed and that of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 1336/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 729/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 M/S Sad Bhawna, Vs Acit, C/O M/S Rra Taxindia, Central Circle-6, D-28, South Extension, Part-1, New Delhi-110001 New Delhi-110049 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadts4076K

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT-DR
Section 153CSection 254

68,675/- on account of disallowance of donations paid to the FIITJEE Group entities. The appellant, in its submission emphatically stated that the direction of Hon'ble ITAT was not complied by the AO. It was stated that the Hon'ble ITAT, while remanding matter back to the file of AO, had simply directed him to verify if the donations

SAD BHAWNA,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-06, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed and that of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 729/DEL/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 729/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 M/S Sad Bhawna, Vs Acit, C/O M/S Rra Taxindia, Central Circle-6, D-28, South Extension, Part-1, New Delhi-110001 New Delhi-110049 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadts4076K

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. H. K. Choudhary, CIT-DR
Section 153CSection 254

68,675/- on account of disallowance of donations paid to the FIITJEE Group entities. The appellant, in its submission emphatically stated that the direction of Hon'ble ITAT was not complied by the AO. It was stated that the Hon'ble ITAT, while remanding matter back to the file of AO, had simply directed him to verify if the donations