OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

143(3) of the Act. Therefore, we are proceeding to adjudicate the other issue raised by the assessee which is common to all the assessment years and will have a bearing on the AY 2010-11. The seized diaries and the income arising therefrom do not belong to the assessee. 48 Another legal issue argued before us is that

OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

143(3) of the Act. Therefore, we are proceeding to adjudicate the other issue raised by the assessee which is common to all the assessment years and will have a bearing on the AY 2010-11. The seized diaries and the income arising therefrom do not belong to the assessee. 48 Another legal issue argued before us is that

OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA,TELANGNA vs. ACIT, CC-26, NEW DELHI

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

143(3) of the Act. Therefore, we are proceeding to adjudicate the other issue raised by the assessee which is common to all the assessment years and will have a bearing on the AY 2010-11. The seized diaries and the income arising therefrom do not belong to the assessee. 48 Another legal issue argued before us is that

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD., GHAZIABAD

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPERSTAR AGENCY PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, GHAZIABAD

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, WARD-7(1), NEW DELHI vs. DELIGHT RESORTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

M/S GLOBUS REAL INFRA PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

143(3) - Share Capital – section 68 31,00,00,000 D R - Unexplained expenses 7,75,000 D Not challenged (alleged commission expenses) - sec 69C TOTAL 10,68,85,85,409 4. Thus, out of total addition of Rs. 10,65,22,85,409/- made u/ss. 68, 69C & 14A in the cases of the Assessees herein, additions aggregating