BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

632 results for “section 68”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai633Delhi632Chennai559Kolkata532Hyderabad357Ahmedabad309Bangalore252Pune244Jaipur213Chandigarh139Surat138Karnataka130Lucknow86Indore73Calcutta71Amritsar63Rajkot62Cochin55Visakhapatnam50Raipur49Panaji49Cuttack36Nagpur36Patna28Guwahati24Jodhpur21Agra21SC14Dehradun12Telangana12Varanasi10Allahabad9Jabalpur8Orissa4Ranchi3Rajasthan3Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 68128Addition to Income80Section 143(3)50Section 14748Section 14836Section 153A30Section 143(1)26Condonation of Delay25Section 153C24Section 153D

M/S. BOUTIQUE HOTELS INDIA (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 7042/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Neel Kanth Khandelwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjog Kapoor, Sr. DR
Section 253(3)Section 80I

condone delay for sufficient cause on the facts and circumstances of each case.” The consistent view is that such question would be a question of fact simpliciter and would not be covered under the provisions of section 256 of the Act unless such exercise of discretion or conclusion arrived at was perverse or so illogical that no reasonable person could

J. M. HOUSING LIMITED,DELHI vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL) KNP MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 632 · Page 1 of 32

...
23
Limitation/Time-bar23
Disallowance20
ITA 8248/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member [Assessment Year: 2021-22] J.M. Housing Limited, Pr.Cit (Central) Kanpur, At Meerut, 312/3T/F5 Pratap Bhawan, Aayakar Bhawan, Bhainsali Ground, Bhahadur Shah Zafar Marg, Vs Meerut, Uttar Pradesh-25001 Central Delhi, Delhi-11002 Pan-Aaccj1692E Assessee Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271ASection 68

condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate this appeal. 3. The only issue raised by the assessee through grounds of appeal no.1 to 6 is regarding invocation of her revisionary authority under section 263 by the ld. PCIT, Central Kanpur, at Meerut through his order dated 27.03.2025. As per brief factual matrix of the case, appellant had filed original Return

M/S VINMAN ESTATES (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1589/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NAGESHWAR REALTORS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1972/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GEE GEE BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1975/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S WITNESS BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 1971/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. BELIEVE DEVELOPERS & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6444/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LKG BUILDERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 118/DEL/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S LAKSHYA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,, GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6433/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

M/S ASHUTOSH DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6358/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LKG BUILDERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 121/DEL/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. ASHUTOSH DEVELOPERS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 122/DEL/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

M/S LKG BUILDERS (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6356/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

M/S KING BUILDCON (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 3081/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S LAKSHYA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,, GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6432/DEL/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SHINE STAR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 3456/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

M/S LKG BUILDERS (P) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 6353/DEL/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

M/S. PEGASUS SOFTECH (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2274/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

M/S. WORLDWIDE REALTORS (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2280/DEL/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed and appeal of the Department dismissed

ITA 2606/DEL/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The A.O. accordingly made addition of Rs.2,13,70,020/-. The assessment was completed under section 153A/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 15th March 2013. 6. The assessee challenged both the additions on merit as well as assumption of jurisdiction to proceed under section 153A of the Income