BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai33Chennai19Jaipur16Bangalore11Delhi10Ahmedabad9Hyderabad9Visakhapatnam8Kolkata7Cochin6Jodhpur6Pune5Amritsar4Karnataka4Panaji2Chandigarh2Nagpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 14811Section 80P7Section 1477Section 80P(2)6Section 2506Section 143(3)5Section 1545Section 1434Addition to Income

THE MANTOLA COOPERATIVE THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 483/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jun 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri S. V. Mehrotra & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M K Jain, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 148Section 57Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(i)Section 80p

147 of the Act for assumption of jurisdiction by the AO, having not been satisfied, initiation of reassessment as well as the impugned reassessment order was impermissible in law. 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in law in holding that interest income of Rs.97,28,027 earned by the appellant on funds

4
Deduction3
Limitation/Time-bar3
Condonation of Delay3

CAIRN UK HOLDING LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 5 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1669/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Puri CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144

2)/2Q13-14/453 dated ' 25.02.2014" (Emphasis added) 6.8 Further, in the said reasons, at various places reference was given of the February 2014. This goes to prove that the survey report was received by the AO in the month of February 2014 only. 6.9 In view of the above, the Appellant submits that since the survey report had been received

THE KADIYAN COOP. L&C SOCIETY LTD.,PANIPAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE PANIPAT, PANIPAT

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 667/DEL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Nov 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishithe Kadiyan Coop L&C Society Vs. Acit, Ltd, Circle Panipat V&Po Sewah, Panipat, Haryana Pan: Aaalt0541R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Aneja, AdvFor Respondent: Shri N.K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 1Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 155Section 80

D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M. 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT (A), karnal dated 01.12.2017 for the Assessment Year 2007-08. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case proceedings sought

M/S. THE RAMA CO-OP L/C SOCIETY LTD.,SONEPAT vs. ACIT, SONEPAT

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed

ITA 3914/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Feb 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra : & Ms. Suchitra Kamble :

For Respondent: Shri T.Vasanthan DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 44ASection 80PSection 80P(2)

D E R PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M: These appeals have been preferred by the assessees assailing the respective orders passed by the CIT(A) relating to AY 2007-08. Since Common issues are involved for adjudication, all these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. As the facts

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(5), GURGAON, GURUGRAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment

ITA 1038/DEL/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shuklaas S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 250Section 4(5)

D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J. M. : The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 18.10.2017, passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–2, Gurgaon [hereinafter referred to as CIT (Appeals)] for the quantum of assessment passed under Section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) pertaining

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GURGAON, GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment

ITA 1052/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shuklaas S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 250Section 4(5)

D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J. M. : The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 18.10.2017, passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–2, Gurgaon [hereinafter referred to as CIT (Appeals)] for the quantum of assessment passed under Section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) pertaining

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GURGAON, GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment

ITA 1053/DEL/2021[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Amit Shuklaas S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 250Section 4(5)

D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J. M. : The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 18.10.2017, passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–2, Gurgaon [hereinafter referred to as CIT (Appeals)] for the quantum of assessment passed under Section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) pertaining

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GURGAON, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1054/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg[Assessment Year : 2014-15] Galleria Condominium Vs Ito, Association, Galleria Building, Ward-1(3), Dlf Phase Iv, Dlf City, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana-122002. Pan-Aaaag3018P Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Rishabh Aggarwal, Ca & Ms. Jaishree, Ca Respondent By Shri Mithalesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 13.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 19.09.2022

Section 140Section 147Section 194Section 80P(2)(d)

u/s 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961 by the Ld. A.O. were merely based on the suspicion and without any tangible material so as to* suggest any escapement of income. Hence the reassessment proceedings are liable to be quashed. 3. Whether the Ld. AO is not justified in disallowing the claim of Interest income on the basis of concept

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2954/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 2954/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Dcit, Vs M/S Punjab National Bank, Circle-20(1), Ho: Finance Division, 5, Sansad New Delhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp0165G

For Appellant: Sh. S. Krishnan, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT DR
Section 142(1)

section 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D and has disallowed a sum of Rs.2,86,69,45,381/-on a tax free income of Rs. 143,35,22,679/- from dividend and other tax-free income. In this connection we wish to submit as under:- 4.1 Bank has claimed the following income as exempt from

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3041/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 May 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Bhavnesh Sainidr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 2954/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Dcit, Vs M/S Punjab National Bank, Circle-20(1), Ho: Finance Division, 5, Sansad New Delhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp0165G

For Appellant: Sh. S. Krishnan, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Sushma Singh, CIT DR
Section 142(1)

section 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D and has disallowed a sum of Rs.2,86,69,45,381/-on a tax free income of Rs. 143,35,22,679/- from dividend and other tax-free income. In this connection we wish to submit as under:- 4.1 Bank has claimed the following income as exempt from