BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Delhi5Bangalore3Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 80I8Section 2714Section 133A4Section 1334Bogus/Accommodation Entry4Bogus Purchases4Penalty4Addition to Income4Survey u/s 133A4Section 139(5)3Section 143(1)2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-17, NEW DELHI vs. AL AMMAR FROZEN FOODS EXPORTS PVT. LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and cross\nobjection filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2180/DEL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jun 2025AY 2019-20
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 44ASection 80I

35E, section 44AB, section 44DA, section\n50B, section 80-IA, section 80-IB, section 80JJAA,\nsection 92F, section 115JB, section 115JC and section\n115VW of the Act are proposed to be amended\naccordingly.\"\n\n13.\nAccording to learned counsel, it was the aforesaid\nrationale which informed the amendments ultimately\nmade in sub-section (7). Mr. Sethi sought to highlight

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3931/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3930/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3929/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3932/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed