BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Delhi4Bangalore3Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 2714Section 133A4Section 1334Bogus/Accommodation Entry4Bogus Purchases4Penalty4Addition to Income4Survey u/s 133A4

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3931/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3930/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3929/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VISHNU GOEL, DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3932/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

u/s 144 read with section 147 and 148 of The Income Tax Act was passed on 24/12/2007 determining the total income of the assessee at " 13 6220 6929/– against the returned income of Rs. 74 304/–. 09. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned AO preferred appeal before the learned CIT (A) – 16, New Delhi who passed