BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

34 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai58Hyderabad36Delhi34Jaipur25Mumbai20Surat20Ahmedabad17Bangalore17Jodhpur10Patna9Rajkot8Pune8Chandigarh5Raipur3Indore3Amritsar3Agra2Kolkata2Lucknow2Nagpur1Jabalpur1Dehradun1Cuttack1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 14753Section 143(3)41Addition to Income32Section 14828Reopening of Assessment25Reassessment22Section 142(3)16Section 6816Cash Deposit

ZIA RATHI,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-44(3), DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1881/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalmrs. Zia Rathi, Income Tax Officer, 274, Dda Flats, Sector-1A, Ward-44(3), Dwarka Nasirpur, Vs. Delhi. New Delhi-110045. Pan-Bsvpr9218M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. Shri Somil Agarwal, Adv. Shri Saksham Agarwal, Ca & Shri Deepesh Garg, Adv. Department By Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 04/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16/01/2026 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi (‘Ld. Cit(A)’ In Short) Dated 27.02.2024 In Appeal No. Cit(A), Delhi- 15/11146/2019-20 Arising Out Of The Order Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ For Short) For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Is Sole Proprietor Of M/S Veezee Traders Engaged In The Business Of Trading Of Pvc Coated Imported Fabric. The Zia Rathi Vs. Ito

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 68

demonetization period for which case was reopened u's 147 and which was accepted by Ld. AO in the reassessment order to have been made substantially from the cash sale of Rs8,60,62,562/- effected by the appellant. (1) In fact, foremost argument of the assessee is that this case was reopened u/s

Showing 1–20 of 34 · Page 1 of 2

10
Section 142(1)9
Section 1517
Section 1317

KUNDAN RICE MILLS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 593/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Central Circle 14, E-4, Industrial Area, New Delhi Panipat, Haryana Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Vs. Dcit, E-4, Industrial Area, Central Circle 14, Panipat, Haryana New Delhi Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dcit, Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Central Circle 14, E-4, Industrial Area, New Delhi Panipat, Haryana Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh, CIT (DR) &
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 69A

reassessment proceeding and issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act. 2 That the order dated 08.02.2024 passed-u/s 250 of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26, New Delhi is against law and facts on the file in as much as he was not justified to partly uphold the action of the Ld Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LIMITED, HARYANA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 548/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Central Circle 14, E-4, Industrial Area, New Delhi Panipat, Haryana Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Vs. Dcit, E-4, Industrial Area, Central Circle 14, Panipat, Haryana New Delhi Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dcit, Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Central Circle 14, E-4, Industrial Area, New Delhi Panipat, Haryana Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh, CIT (DR) &
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 69A

reassessment proceeding and issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act. 2 That the order dated 08.02.2024 passed-u/s 250 of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26, New Delhi is against law and facts on the file in as much as he was not justified to partly uphold the action of the Ld Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LIMITED, HARYANA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 573/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Central Circle 14, E-4, Industrial Area, New Delhi Panipat, Haryana Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Vs. Dcit, E-4, Industrial Area, Central Circle 14, Panipat, Haryana New Delhi Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dcit, Vs. Kundan Rice Mills Ltd., Central Circle 14, E-4, Industrial Area, New Delhi Panipat, Haryana Pin: 132 103 Pan No. Aaack7098P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh, CIT (DR) &
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 69A

reassessment proceeding and issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act. 2 That the order dated 08.02.2024 passed-u/s 250 of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26, New Delhi is against law and facts on the file in as much as he was not justified to partly uphold the action of the Ld Assessing Officer

KAJAL BATRA,DELHI vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-52(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as above

ITA 2419/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69A

147 of the Act. There is no approval u/s 151 by the competent authority nor such approval was made available to the assessee. Even if there is one, it 1 Kajal Batra appears to be granted mechanically without application of mind and after the reasons were recorded. 3. The CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating that the final order

NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 9617/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI vs. NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 884/DEL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI vs. NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 883/DEL/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 9618/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI vs. NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1949/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 9616/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 9615/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

NEHA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CC-14, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1026/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 147Section 148

147 of the Act, bad in law and are contrary to the facts. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the reopening ignoring the fact that there is no live nexus between the reasons recorded and the belief formed by the assessing officer

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, NEW DELHI vs. B.R. GOEL & SONS, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and both the Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1768/DEL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri C. S. Anand, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

reassessment proceedings clarified to AO that torn currency notes were deposited with normal currency notes while providing date wise details of cash withdrawn and cash deposited in the bank account. The learned counsel further submitted that the assessee used to withdraw cash out of its bank account and used to deposit the cash in its bank accounts from time

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 29, NEW DELHI vs. B.R. GOEL & SONS, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and both the Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1769/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri C. S. Anand, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

reassessment proceedings clarified to AO that torn currency notes were deposited with normal currency notes while providing date wise details of cash withdrawn and cash deposited in the bank account. The learned counsel further submitted that the assessee used to withdraw cash out of its bank account and used to deposit the cash in its bank accounts from time

DCIT, CIRCLE- 19(1), DELHI vs. R. GOPAL IMPEX PVT.LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee as well as the Revenue

ITA 82/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 1Section 147Section 151

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) alleging that assessee has deposited cash of Rs. 1,34,88,000/- in his bank account during the demonetization period. During the course of reassessment proceedings, assessee submitted the details explaining the source of cash in Specified Bank Notes (SBN) deposits. The NFAC also asked the assessee to explain

R. GOPAL IMPEX PVT LTD,DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee as well as the Revenue

ITA 5607/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 1Section 147Section 151

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) alleging that assessee has deposited cash of Rs. 1,34,88,000/- in his bank account during the demonetization period. During the course of reassessment proceedings, assessee submitted the details explaining the source of cash in Specified Bank Notes (SBN) deposits. The NFAC also asked the assessee to explain

ACIT, CC-29, NEW DELHI vs. SUBHASH CHNAD GUPTA, DELHI

Accordingly, the grounds raised by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1557/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sudhir Kumarsubhash Chand Gupta Vs. Acit, B-41, Kailash Colony, Central Circle – 29, New Delhi – 110 054 New Delhi Pan: Aaapg 2554 K (Appellant) (Respondent) & Acit, Vs. Subhash Chand Gupta Central Circle – 29, 43/1M Rajpur Road, New Delhi Civil Lines, North Delhi, New Delhi – 110 054 Pan: Aaapg 2554 K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sankalp Malik, Adv. Revenue By: Shri V. K. Dubey, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing 14/10/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18/10/2024 O R D E R Per M. Balaganesh, A. M.: The Appeals In Ita Nos. 2529/Del/2022 & Ita 1. No.1557/Del/2021 For Ays 2015-16 & 2017-18, Arises Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New

For Appellant: Shri Sankalp Malik, AdvFor Respondent: Shri V. K. Dubey, Sr. D.R
Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In response to which assessee has failed to furnish satisfactory reply. 3. Therefore, on the facts and case as stated above, I have reason to believe that income of Rs.35,01,600/- has escaped assessment. Therefore, I propose to reasons the aforesaid income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment. (Vijay Singh

SUBHASH CHAND GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, NEW DELHI

Accordingly, the grounds raised by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2529/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sudhir Kumarsubhash Chand Gupta Vs. Acit, B-41, Kailash Colony, Central Circle – 29, New Delhi – 110 054 New Delhi Pan: Aaapg 2554 K (Appellant) (Respondent) & Acit, Vs. Subhash Chand Gupta Central Circle – 29, 43/1M Rajpur Road, New Delhi Civil Lines, North Delhi, New Delhi – 110 054 Pan: Aaapg 2554 K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sankalp Malik, Adv. Revenue By: Shri V. K. Dubey, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing 14/10/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18/10/2024 O R D E R Per M. Balaganesh, A. M.: The Appeals In Ita Nos. 2529/Del/2022 & Ita 1. No.1557/Del/2021 For Ays 2015-16 & 2017-18, Arises Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New

For Appellant: Shri Sankalp Malik, AdvFor Respondent: Shri V. K. Dubey, Sr. D.R
Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In response to which assessee has failed to furnish satisfactory reply. 3. Therefore, on the facts and case as stated above, I have reason to believe that income of Rs.35,01,600/- has escaped assessment. Therefore, I propose to reasons the aforesaid income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment. (Vijay Singh

BRIJWASI JEWELLERS,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1027/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 9284/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 9355/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 9356/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1027/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Brijwasi Jewellers, Vs Acit, 1170, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni Central Circle-14, Chowk, Delhi-110006 New Delhi-110006 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaafb2917R Ita No. 880/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 881/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 882/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 1950/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2017-18 Acit, Vs Brijwasi Jewellers, Central Circle-14, 1170, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni New Delhi-110006 Chowk, Delhi-110006 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaafb2917R Assessee By : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. & Sh. Aman Garg, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Kanv Bali, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 08.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.10.2023 Order Per Bench:

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Kanv Bali, Sr. DR
Section 142(3)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment proceedings initiated by the learned AO without valid approval of the prescribed authority under the Act is bad in law and liable to be quashed. 10.(i) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the addition of Rs.67,64,541/- made