BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

571 results for “reassessment”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai840Delhi571Ahmedabad340Chennai304Jaipur281Kolkata213Hyderabad207Bangalore176Pune138Chandigarh113Rajkot113Indore83Visakhapatnam59Nagpur57Patna56Surat51Guwahati47Raipur46Amritsar45Agra42Cochin40Lucknow27Jodhpur24Allahabad18Cuttack12Dehradun10Ranchi7Panaji3Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14794Section 14885Addition to Income79Section 153A66Section 6862Section 153C61Section 143(3)39Reassessment38Section 13230Reopening of Assessment

DELHI, DELHI vs. SMA GOYAL JEWELLERS PVT LTD, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5583/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwalacit, Sma Goyal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-29, I-45, Arya Samaj Road, New Delhi. Vs. Uttam Nagar, West Delhi-110059. Pan:Aajcs4890G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sanjeev Batra, Adv. & Shri Kailash Khemani, Ca Department By Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12.09.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-30 In Appeal No. 08/10437/2019-20 Dated 25.09.2024 For Assessment Year 2017-18 Arising Out Of Assessment Order Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Is A Company & E-Filed Its Return Of Income On 23.10.2017 Declaring Total Income At Rs.4,35,580/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Complete Scrutiny. Assessee Has Made Cash Deposit Of Rs.98,00,000/- In Specified Bank Notes (Sbn) In Kotak Mahindra Bank Account. During The Course Of The Assessment Proceedings, Details Have Been Asked For Time To Time & The Assessing Officer Has Issued Summons To The Parties To Whom Sales Stated To Have Been Made In Cash. Since, Most Of The Parties Has Not Responded To The Notices Issued By The Assessing Officer, He Was Of The Opinion That Cash Deposited During

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69A

unexplained money under section 69A of the Act and taxed it under section 115BBE. CIT(A) order:- The assessee preferred an appeal challenging the reassessment

Showing 1–20 of 571 · Page 1 of 29

...
29
Section 15122
Search & Seizure21

DCIT, CC-20, DELHI vs. RAJIV AGARWAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the appellant for AYs

ITA 2627/DEL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri P. N. Barnwal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 153C

reassess the income of the person to whom such assets/books belong in accordance with Section 153A of the Act. 23. In the present case, the Assessee had claimed that the assessments for the concerned assessment years were not pending on the date of recording of satisfaction by the AO and, therefore, would not abate by virtue of the second proviso

DCIT, CC-20, DELHI vs. RAJIV AGARWAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the appellant for AYs

ITA 2629/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri P. N. Barnwal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 153C

reassess the income of the person to whom such assets/books belong in accordance with Section 153A of the Act. 23. In the present case, the Assessee had claimed that the assessments for the concerned assessment years were not pending on the date of recording of satisfaction by the AO and, therefore, would not abate by virtue of the second proviso

DCIT, CC-20, DELHI vs. RAJIV AGARWAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the appellant for AYs

ITA 2628/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri P. N. Barnwal, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 153C

reassess the income of the person to whom such assets/books belong in accordance with Section 153A of the Act. 23. In the present case, the Assessee had claimed that the assessments for the concerned assessment years were not pending on the date of recording of satisfaction by the AO and, therefore, would not abate by virtue of the second proviso

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, NOIDA, NOIDA vs. NAGPAL FABRICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1596/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Dec 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Vimal Kumar[Assessment Year : 2021-22] Dcit Vs Nagpal Fabrics Pvt.Ltd. Central Circle-Ii 697 Katra Neel Chandni Noida. Chowk, New Delhi-110006. Pan-Aabcn9620F Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Amit Shukla, Sr. Dr Respondent By Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Adv. & Shri Govind Agarwal, Ca Date Of Hearing 21.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.12.2024

money etc. (Agricultural income) - Assessment year 2010-11 During relevant year, assessee earned agricultural income which was exempt from tax Assessee filed its return declaring certain other taxable income Assessment was completed without taking assessee's return in scrutiny Subsequently, Assessing Officer issued notice seeking to reopen assessment on ground that these was a big mismatch between returned income

ITO, WARD-18(), NEW DELHI vs. NIVIA AGENCIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1009/DEL/2021[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2025AY 2002-03

Bench: MS. MADHUMITA ROY (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 139(1)Section 142Section 143(1)Section 144Section 148Section 250(6)Section 68

reassessment proceedings, notices were issued u/s 142(10 from time to time which were duly complied with and thereafter, the assessment was completed at total income of Rs.3,99,70,1900/- by making of ITO vs. Nivia Agencies Pvt. Ltd. addition of Rs.4 Cr. on account of share application money and share premium received during the year. 3. Aggrieved

SAROJ SANGWAN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 4(1), GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as

ITA 2428/DEL/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 May 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2428/Del/2023 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151

unexplained money and disregarded the return of income and responses filed by the Appellant. 4. The Reassessment proceedings and the impugned

DCIT, VIKASH BHAWAN DELHI vs. RAJAN KUMAR, LAXMI NAGAR,DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue appeal is dismissed and the cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 130/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Smt. Renu Jauhridcit Vs Rajan Kumar Room No. 218-D Block, 31,Vijay Block Laxmi Vikash Bhawan, Nagar Delhi-110092 Delhi- 110 002 Pan: Caapk8381E

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act made by the AO. The reasoning and findings of the Ld. NFAC, while granting relief is on the proper appreciation of law expounded by the judicial dicta. We do not find any reasons to interfere with the findings of the NFAC. The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Assesse’s Cross objection

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1431/DEL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

unexplained money u/s 69A is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and the same is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 5. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the action

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1429/DEL/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

unexplained money u/s 69A is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and the same is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 5. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the action

SUNITA BHARDWAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1430/DEL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 69A

unexplained money u/s 69A is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and the same is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 5. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the action

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1330/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 2419/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT, CC-20 , NEW DELHI vs. GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT.LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 939/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 934/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL , DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 944/DEL/2022[2017--18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT,CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. DEVESH MITTAL, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 943/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT, CC-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARAMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 931/DEL/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 1329/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. PARMANAND AND SONS FOODS PRODUCTS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as follows:

ITA 933/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 711, 712 & 713/Del/2022 A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kwality Techmech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit/Acit, B-20, Lawrence Road Cc-20, Industrial Area , Delhi Keshav Puram, North West Delhi, Delhi-110035 Pan : Aaeck1176E Appellant Respondent

Section 69B

unexplained money, was restricted to Rs.49,21,568/- and this ground of appeal was partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Against this assessee is in appeal before us. 55. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. As we have already held that the addition is based on the loose slips found during