BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai25Surat16Pune7Cochin7Delhi6Chennai5Ahmedabad4Jodhpur4Kolkata3Hyderabad3Chandigarh2Indore2Bangalore1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 14A10Section 10A10Section 80P(2)(d)6Disallowance6Deduction5Exemption4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 80I3Section 2(45)

CIT vs. TEI TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

ITA/347/2011HC Delhi27 Aug 2012

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 260ASection 72

80J or under section 80-I in relation to the profits and gains of the industrial undertaking for any previous year relevant to the assessment year immediately ITA Nos.347/2011 & 2067/2010 Page 9 of 32 succeeding the last assessment year comprised in the tax holiday period or any subsequent assessment year; and (iv) In computing the depreciation allowance under section

CIT vs. TEI TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

ITA/2067/2010HC Delhi27 Aug 2012

CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

2
Section 80A(1)2
Section 80A2
Bench:
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 260ASection 72

80J or under section 80-I in relation to the profits and gains of the industrial undertaking for any previous year relevant to the assessment year immediately ITA Nos.347/2011 & 2067/2010 Page 9 of 32 succeeding the last assessment year comprised in the tax holiday period or any subsequent assessment year; and (iv) In computing the depreciation allowance under section

CIT vs. KRIBHCO

ITA - 444 / 2011HC Delhi18 Jul 2012
Section 14ASection 2(45)Section 5Section 80ASection 80A(1)Section 80B(5)Section 80P(2)(d)

reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154, for any assessment year beginning on or before the 1st day of April, 2001. xxxx 80-A. Deductions to be made in computing total income.—(1) In computing the total income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/444/2011HC Delhi18 Jul 2012
Section 14ASection 2(45)Section 5Section 80ASection 80A(1)Section 80B(5)Section 80P(2)(d)

reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154, for any assessment year beginning on or before the 1st day of April, 2001. xxxx 80-A. Deductions to be made in computing total income.—(1) In computing the total income

SARA SERVICES & ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and those of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes in the manner as indicated above

ITA 408/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Jan 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri O.P. Sapra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sujit Kumar, Sr-DR
Section 80I

reassessment order, the assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(A) wherein the ld. CIT(A) upheld the validity of reopening of assessment and allowed the entire amount of commission and also accepted the assessee’s claim with respect of ITA Nos. 408 to 410 & 545 to 547 M/s Sara Services & Engineers P. Ltd computation of deduction u/s 80HHC with

RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, we direct the AO to reduce the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act by the amount of reversal of the provision of Rs

ITA 196/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Apr 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. I. C.Sudhir Judicialmember & Sh. Prashant Maharishia.Y.: - 2008-09 Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs Acit 12Th Floor, Devika Tower, Range -15 6, Nehru Place New Delhi New Delhi Pan No. Aaacr0127N (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: 1. Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amrendra Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 92D

Section (2) to Section 14A of the Act and sub Rule (1) to Rule 8D of the Rules. 14. The view and legal ratio expressed above is not being elucidated for the first time. The Delhi High Court in Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT [2012] 347 ITR 272/203 Taxman 364/15 taxmann.com 390 has observed:- 'Scope of sub-sections