BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 54Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Pune6Delhi3Kolkata3Bangalore3Nagpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 5411Section 54E9Section 2634Section 1433House Property2Exemption2Deduction2Addition to Income2

SH. DEVENDER KUMAR AGGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3104/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Oct 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri Prashant Maharishidevender Kumar Aggarwal, Cit 1533, Ranu Bagh, New Delhi Delhi-Ix, New Delhi Vs. Pan:Aaapa1974F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Satish Khosla, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Mitali Madhusmita, CIT DR
Section 143Section 263Section 54Section 54E

54E." 8. The Tribunal in the case of Ramesh Narhari Jakhadi ( supra) while construing Section 54B of the said Act applied the Circular No.359 dated 10.5.1983 to hold that an investment made in Bonds out of advance received for transfer of land before the actual date of transfer would be entitled to the benefit of exemption under Section

RAM MOHAN RAI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 2 and 3 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6612/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Apr 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishiram Mohan Rai, Vs. Acit, A-8/25, Vansant Vihar, Circle-33(1), New Delhi New Delhi Pan:Aaapr0728C (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. FR Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 234BSection 54

reassessment proceedings. The learned counsel placed reliance on the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Pawan Arya v. CIT[2011] 11 taxmann.com 312/200 Taxman 66 (Mag.), and the decision of the ITAT - Mumbai in Narender Khubchandani v. ITO [IT Appeal No. 238 (Mum.) of 2011, dated 17-12-2014]. Under these facts, after considering

ANGEELA VASANDANI,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessees is partly allowed

ITA 7201/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2010-11 Angeela Vasandani, Vs Dcit, 93, Pocket-Ii, Jasola, International Taxation, New Delhi. Circle-3(1)(1), New Delhi. Pan: Ahtpv3859Q

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Section 2Section 54ESection 55(2)(b)

section 55A(a) of the Act cannot be applied and no reference is possible to be made to the DVO for determining the market value of the 5 property at a figure less than that shown by the assessee. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer had no authority to make any such reference to the DVO to determine the value