RAJEEV BHEL,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals for AY 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra : & Shri C.M. Garg :

Section 1 53A of the Act and the reference to the date of search would have to be construed as the reference to the date of recording of satisfaction. It would follow the six assessment years for which assessments/ reassessments

RAJEEV BEHL,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals for AY 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra : & Shri C.M. Garg :

Section 1 53A of the Act and the reference to the date of search would have to be construed as the reference to the date of recording of satisfaction. It would follow the six assessment years for which assessments/ reassessments

RAJEEV BEHL,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals for AY 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra : & Shri C.M. Garg :

Section 1 53A of the Act and the reference to the date of search would have to be construed as the reference to the date of recording of satisfaction. It would follow the six assessment years for which assessments/ reassessments

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. UDAI SHANKAR AWASTHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

reassess the income of the non-\nsearched person in accordance with the provisions of section 1 53A of\nthe Act. While

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. UDAI SHANKER AWASTHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

reassess the income of the non-\nsearched person in accordance with the provisions of section 1 53A of\nthe Act. While

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. UDAI SHANKER AWASTHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

reassess the income of the non-\nsearched person in accordance with the provisions of section 1 53A of\nthe Act. While

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. UDAI SHANKER AWASTHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

reassess the income of the non-\nsearched person in accordance with the provisions of section 1 53A of\nthe Act. While

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. UDAI SHANKER AWASTHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

reassess the income of the non-\nsearched person in accordance with the provisions of section 1 53A of\nthe Act. While

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LANDBASE INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, cross objections of the

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri L.P. Sahu

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act against the assessee for A.Y 2001-02 beyond four years cannot be held as invalid assumption of jurisdiction and finally part conclusion 29 CO No. 328/Del/2009 & 111/2010 of the ld. CIT(A) on legal contention and objection of the assessee are upheld. Since facts

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. LANDBASE INDIA LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, cross objections of the

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri L.P. Sahu

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act and issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act against the assessee for A.Y 2001-02 beyond four years cannot be held as invalid assumption of jurisdiction and finally part conclusion 29 CO No. 328/Del/2009 & 111/2010 of the ld. CIT(A) on legal contention and objection of the assessee are upheld. Since facts

ANAND JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

SAJAN KUMAR JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,FARIDABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

ANAND JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

SATISH DEV JAIN,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

ANAND KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the determination of the total income of such other person [for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. VALMIK THAPAR, NEW DELHI

Appeals are disposed of by this common order as indicated above

Bench: Hon’Ble Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Acit, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Dcit, M/S. R. N. Khanna & Company, Ca, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Agarwal, Senior Advocate Along With Shri Shailesh Gupta, Shri Mahur Agarwal, Advocates Revenue By: Shri H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11/06/2021 (Last Hearing) Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2021. O R D E R Per Prashant Maharishi, A. M. 1. These Are Three Appeals For Two Assessment Years Pertaining To One Assessee, Mr. Valmik Thapar, A Resident, Individual [Assessee]. Assessee Filed Ita Number

reassessment proceedings, assessee submitted that the assessee entered into a collaboration agreement on 29th of April 2006 in financial year 2006 – 07, pertaining to assessment year 2007 – 08. Assessee entered into a collaboration agreement on 29 April 2006, which became effective from 11 April 2007 with the receipt of part consideration from the builder and handing over the property