RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA,DELHI vs. LD. ITO, WARD 35(1), DELHI, DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 3447/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Oct 2025AY 2021-22
Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member [Assessment Year: 2021-22] Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Income Tax Officer, Ward-35(1), B-2/38, Ground Floor, E-2, Civic Centre, Delhi-110002 Ashok Vihar, Phase-Ii, Vs Delhi-110052 Pan-Aafhr8657H Appellant Respondent
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 270A
40,453. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred both in law and on facts in passing ex- parte order under section 250 of the Act without granting virtual /
physical hearing.
3. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently argued that the notice u/s 270A dated 21.12.2022 issued by the Revenue is infructuous on account