BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 282Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai24Raipur14Bangalore8Chandigarh7Rajkot3Delhi3Hyderabad3Jodhpur1Amritsar1Panaji1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 14822Section 15110Section 1476Section 1444Section 2503Section 683Section 143(2)2Reassessment2Addition to Income2Reopening of Assessment

ALI MOHAMMAD,GHAZIABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5608/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M Balaganeshआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5608/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 बनाम Ali Mohammad Acit, Mohalla Kot Kachchi Saray, Vs. Circle-2(1)(1), Murad Nagar, Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad. Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Etopm2968E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 3

reassessment orders arc also without jurisdiction. Section 282A of the Act, 1961 has no relevance with respect to the recording

REENA MITTAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee on this additional

2
ITA 2021/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2016-17

Section 10(38)Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 292BSection 68

sections 147/148/151 of the Income Tax Act therefore such assessment is void ab initio and liable to be quashed," Additional Ground No.4 "On facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in law in upholding the impugned reassessment proceedings ignoring the fact that the jurisdictional notice u/s 148 was never served upon the appellant

NEW EDGE SHARES AND SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 18(1), DELHI, DELHI

ITA 1691/DEL/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Vimal Kumarshri Vimal Kumar

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

282A rwr 127 of IT rules 1962 and therefore, such proceedings without s rules 1962 and therefore, such proceedings without service of notice ervice of notice u/s 148 is valid in law and void u/s 148 is valid in law and void-ab-initio. ITA No. 2. On facts and circumstances of the case, the authorities below have On facts