BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai33Ahmedabad13Pune9Cuttack8Chennai5Patna4Agra3Delhi3Rajkot3Jaipur2Chandigarh2Indore2Kolkata2Nagpur2Raipur2Hyderabad1Dehradun1Surat1Lucknow1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 285Section 142(1)4Section 1474Section 153A3Addition to Income3Section 1432Section 1482Reassessment2Natural Justice2

RAM NARAYAN BAJAJ,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 32, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1090/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jul 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 124Section 127Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 250

reassessment framed under section 153A r.w.s 143(3)\nare in violation of mandatory provisions of Section 153D of the Act and\nas such the same is bad in eyes of law.\n\n(ii) That the CIT(A) has erred in ignoring the contention of the assessee\nthat the purported approval u/s 153D of the Act is illegal

YOUNG INDIAN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT(E), NEW DELHI

ITA 1251/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conference)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Soparkar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.C. Srivastava, Special Counsel
Section 12ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 28Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viia)

reassessment proceedings. 2. The Appellant prays that the order be held as illegal having been passed in contravention of the principles of natural justice which are applicable to all the income-tax proceedings and mandate that the assessee be given a fair opportunity of hearing before making any addition/disallowance. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO GROUNDS NO. I, II AND III GROUND

A K ENTERPRISES ,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 35(5), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6587/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Sudhir Kumar & Sh. Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2019-20

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 147Section 147rSection 148Section 234Section 234ASection 270A

2. That because both the authorities failed to appreciate, consider verify from the records, that the partnership firm has already closed –down its business activities w.e.f.31-03-2017 as such bearing no transaction if any in their current account no. 419001010050745 maintained with the Union Bank of India. 3. That the ex-parte assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 & 144B