BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 17Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Lucknow11Cochin7Jaipur6Cuttack6Delhi4Kolkata3Mumbai2Ahmedabad2Nagpur1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 153A9Section 688Section 1475Section 1484Addition to Income4Section 143(2)3Section 1512Section 1322Unexplained Cash Credit2Reassessment

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. M.A. PROJECTS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result the Cross Objection filed by assessee stands allowed and the appeal filed by Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 565/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri R.K.Panda & Smt. Beena A Pillaia.Y. 2007-08 Dcit, Central Circle-03 Vs. M.A. Projects (P) Ltd. New Delhi Ba-17A, Dda Flats Asok Vihar New Delhi 110 052 Pan: Aaecm 2372 E Cross Objection No.257/Del/2014 (In Ita 565/Del/2014) Assessment Year 2007-08 M.A.Projects (P) Ltd. Vs. Dcit, C.C. 3 New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Suresh Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Shefali Swaroop, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

17A, DDA Flats Asok Vihar New Delhi 110 052 PAN: AAECM 2372 E Cross Objection No.257/Del/2014 (In ITA 565/Del/2014) Assessment Year 2007-08 M.A.Projects (P) Ltd. vs. DCIT, C.C. 3 New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue by: Ms. Shefali Swaroop, CIT, DR Assessee by: Sh. Suresh Gupta, C.A. Date of hearing: 05.04.2018 Date of Pronouncement: 04.05.2018 ORDER PER BEENA

2
Bogus/Accommodation Entry2

M.A. PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 13, NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6914/DEL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2007-08

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 153ASection 68

17A, DDA Flats, Ashok New Delhi. Vihar, Phase-1, New Delhi PIN: 1100 52 PAN :AAECM2372E (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Suresh Gupta, CA Respondent by Ms. Shivani Singh, CIT DR Date of hearing 20.04.2022 Date of pronouncement 20.05.2022 ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER: The present appeal is filed by the assessee, challenging the order dated 07/09/2018, passed

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STARLIGHT REALTORS (P) LTD., DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and cross objection of the assessee is allowed

ITA 57/DEL/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jul 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. H.S. Sidhu & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2006-07 Acit, Central Circle-3, New Vs. M/S. Starlight Realtors (P) Delhi Ltd., Ba-17A, Dda Flats, Ashok Vihar, Delhi Gir/Pan :Aajcs3398H (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No. 235/Del/2014 [In Ita No. 57/Del/2014] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Starlight Realtors (P) Vs. Acit, Central Circle-3, New Ltd., Ba-17A, Dda Flats, Delhi Ashok Vihar, Delhi Gir/Pan :Aajcs3398H (Appellant) (Respondent) Department By Smt. Pramita M. Bhishwash, Cit(Dr) Assessee By Sh. S.K. Gupta, Ca Date Of Hearing 30.06.2016 Date Of Pronouncement 29.07.2016 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.: This Appeal By The Revenue & The Cross Objection By The Assessee Are Directed Against Order Dated 24/10/2013 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-I, New C.O. No. 235/Del/2014 Ay: 2006-07 Delhi For Assessment Year 2006-07. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Revenue Are As Under: “1. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Erred In Law & On Facts In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.50,00,000/- U/S 68 Of The Act W.R.T. Procurement Of Accommodation Entries Through Share Application Money From Non-Descript Companies. 2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Erred In Law & On Facts In Deleting An Addition Of Rs.25,000/- Made By The Ao W.R.T. Commission Paid @ 5% For Procurement Of Accommodation Entries Through Share Application Money From Non-Descript Companies. 3. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Erred In Admitting Additional Evidence Under Rule 46A. 4. (A)The Order Of The Cit(A) Is Erroneous & Not Tenable In Law & On Facts. (B)The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter Or Amend Any/All The Grounds Of Appeal Before Or During The Course Of The Hearing Of The Appeal.”

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153A(1)Section 68

17A, DDA Flats, Delhi Ashok Vihar, Delhi GIR/PAN :AAJCS3398H (Appellant) (Respondent) Department by Smt. Pramita M. Bhishwash, CIT(DR) Assessee by Sh. S.K. Gupta, CA Date of hearing 30.06.2016 Date of pronouncement 29.07.2016 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.: This appeal by the Revenue and the cross objection by the assessee are directed against order dated 24/10/2013 of the learned Commissioner

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CLIFF CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD., DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical

ITA 6258/DEL/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Nov 2017AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Pandaassessment Year : 2003-04 Acit, Central Circle- 3, Cliff Construction (P) Ltd., New Delhi. Ba- 17A, Vs. Ashok Vihar, Phase- 1, Delhi.

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kr. Gupta, CA
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

17A, Vs. Ashok Vihar, Phase- 1, Delhi. PAN : AAACC0332L (Appellant) (Respondent) : Shri Amit Jain, Sr.DR Department by Assessee by : Shri Suresh Kr. Gupta, CA Date of hearing : 26-10-2017 Date of pronouncement : 08-11-2017 O R D E R PER R. K. PANDA, AM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated