AMOL AWASTHI,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, C.C.1, NEW DELHI
In the result, appeals are allowed, as indicated
ITA 1344/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Sept 2024AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M Balaganesh
For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay B Vasanta, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 153ASection 153C
seizure operation has taken place and preceding 9 assessment years. However, in case of a person other than the searched person, the date of search would be reckoned to be the date on which the Assessing Officer received seized material and recorded satisfaction in terms with section 153C of the Act. Since, the assessee is not the searched person