BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

213 results for “reassessment”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi213Mumbai188Chennai105Bangalore104Jaipur71Kolkata64Chandigarh44Ahmedabad35Lucknow24Pune22Indore22Nagpur18Hyderabad17Agra13Raipur12Cochin12Visakhapatnam9Jodhpur8Patna7Dehradun7Allahabad5Surat5Karnataka4Amritsar4Telangana4Panaji3Cuttack3Jabalpur2SC2Rajkot2Orissa1Varanasi1Guwahati1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 147129Section 154109Section 143(3)91Section 14886Addition to Income54Section 26351Reassessment40Section 153C31Rectification u/s 15431Section 143(1)

RAM KISHORE RATHORE,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 53(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and Revenue appeal is dismissed

ITA 308/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhui.T.A. No. 308/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Sh. Ram Kishore Rathore, Vs. Acit, Circle-53(1), C/O M/S Rra Taxindia New Delhi D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi (Pan:Aaapr4260P) (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Somil Aggarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234A

rectification under Section 154, the self same issue cannot be the subject matter of reassessment by taking recourse to Section 147 of the Act. Thus, on the facts that are available today, as far as the assessment year 2003-2004 is concerned, there are two proceedings, one under Section 154 and another under Section 147 of the Act. The jurisdiction

Showing 1–20 of 213 · Page 1 of 11

...
27
Disallowance26
Deduction24

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), NEW DELHI vs. ANANT RAJ LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed partly as indicated above

ITA 5238/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Nov 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, CA; Ms
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50

reassessment proceedings. When the assessee contended that the said letter should be considered as a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act which

ANANT RAJ LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed partly as indicated above

ITA 4736/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Nov 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, CA; Ms
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50

reassessment proceedings. When the assessee contended that the said letter should be considered as a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act which

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), NEW DELHI vs. ANANT RAJ LTD., NEW DELHI

The appeal is allowed partly as indicated above

ITA 5237/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Nov 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Goel, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, CA; Ms
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50

reassessment proceedings. When the assessee contended that the said letter should be considered as a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act which

MORGAN VENTURES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CC-14, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 8238/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aakash Deep Jain & Shri N.K. Billaiyaita No. 8238/Del/2019 [A.Y 2014-15]

For Appellant: Shri R.S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Sarita Kumari, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 151

rectification order has been framed by the Assessing Officer u/s 154 of the Act and yet, for the same reasons, reassessment

DCIT, GURGAON vs. SH. CHANCHAL SINGH DHEK, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5945/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. R. K. Pandaand. Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2005-06 Dcit Vs. Sh. Chanchal Singh Dhek Circle -1 (1) Prop. M/S. Great Roadways Gurgaon Anaj Mandi Chowk, Gurgaon Pan No. Aaopd6087G (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143Section 154Section 194C(3)Section 40Section 44B

reassessment proceedings. Admittedly there is no discussion on the issue of disallowance u/s. 40 (a) (ia) on account of non deduction of tax from lorry hire charges. Therefore, only course of action available was order u/s. 263 and the AO could not have assumed jurisdiction u/s. 154 of the IT Act. We find the Ld.CIT(A) while quashing the rectification

M/S. RICHA INDUSTRIES LTD.,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1476/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Mar 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. Kuldip Singh & Sh.Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 36Section 80I

rectification u/s 154 was on the basis of ITR, information provided, computation sheet, Form 10CCB and AO's attempt of reopening this case on the same facts and factual material is based upon change of opinion. 7. It is not at all a case of failure on the part of the assessee in disclosure of material facts

M/S. VIMONI INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6978/DEL/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Jan 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Kumarm/S. Vimoni India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle 17 (1), 3-D, Vandana Building, New Delhi. 11, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aaacv3859K) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ajay Wadhwa, Advocate Ms. Ragini Handa, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Anirudh Saran Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.11.2024 Date Of Order : 22.01.2025 O R D E R Per S.Rifaur Rahman,Am:

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anirudh Saran Singh, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 154Section 154(7)Section 43(8)

reassessment proceedings were bad in law and liable to be quashed. 3. Without prejudice to the above, the amount disallowed u/s. 43(8) in respect of unpaid sales tax liability, provident fund and ESI is not correct and hence, the Assessing Officer may kindly be directed to make correct disallowance if any, in accordance with law.” 2. At the time

FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-9(3), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 605/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prakash Chand Yadav & Shri Manish Agarwalfresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. Income Tax Officer, B-310, Som Dutt Chamber, Ward-9(3), Bhikaji Cama Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110066. Pan-Aabcd7720L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

reassessment or recomputation under sub-section (3) of section 143 or under section 144 or under section 147, as the case may be, with respect to the cases referred to in sub-section (2), shall be made in a faceless manner as per the following procedure, namely:— (i) the National Faceless Assessment Centre shall assign the case selected

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA 181/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.S. Syalassessment Year : 2006-07 Sushil Kumar Jain, Vs. Acit, C-67, Neeti Bagh, Circle-37(1), August Kranti Marg, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaipj6676M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Gautam Jain, Advocate Department By : Shri Deepak Garg, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Garg, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154

reassessment proceedings. 4. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material available on record. Page 30 of the paper book is a copy of 2 letter dated 29.10.2013 issued by the AO to the assessee intimating the reasons for reopening of assessment, which are as under:- “The assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI VIKRANT PURI, NEW DELHI

In the result, this Appeal filed by the Revenue

ITA 608/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Mar 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Sh. V.K. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Mohan Govil, CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 56(2)(vi)

reassessment u/s. 148 of the I.T. Act. If the Ld. CIT(A) tries to examine those issues which have not been considered by the AO, then the provisions of section 147 as well as section 263 of the I.T. Act will become redundant and the condition for their operation will be nullified. Our view is supported by the following judgments

VIKRANT PURI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, this Appeal filed by the Revenue

ITA 142/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Mar 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Sh. V.K. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Mohan Govil, CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 56(2)(vi)

reassessment u/s. 148 of the I.T. Act. If the Ld. CIT(A) tries to examine those issues which have not been considered by the AO, then the provisions of section 147 as well as section 263 of the I.T. Act will become redundant and the condition for their operation will be nullified. Our view is supported by the following judgments

VIKRANT PURI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, this Appeal filed by the Revenue

ITA 5789/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Mar 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kant

For Appellant: Sh. V.K. Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Mohan Govil, CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 56(2)(vi)

reassessment u/s. 148 of the I.T. Act. If the Ld. CIT(A) tries to examine those issues which have not been considered by the AO, then the provisions of section 147 as well as section 263 of the I.T. Act will become redundant and the condition for their operation will be nullified. Our view is supported by the following judgments

LNG SECURITIES SERVICES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3708/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jul 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: : Shri C.M. Garg & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Sh. V.V. Kale, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 234A

rectification application was rejected. Aggrieved by the rejection of application u/s. 154, the assessee appealed before the first appellate authority and the first 5 ITA No.3708/Del./2013 appellate authority upheld the order of the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the appellant filed appeal before the ITAT. 5. During the course of hearing, the appellant submitted written

BAANI LANDBASE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 5944/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5944/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Baani Landbase Pvt Ltd., Dcit, Corporate One, Ground Floor, Vs. Circle-4(2), Plot No.5, District Center, Jasola, Central Revenue Building, Delhi. I.P. Estate, Delhi. Pan No.Aadcb0237E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 156Section 292B

reassessment proceedings which were initiated u/s 147 of the Act, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 154 to rectify the assessment order for the very same reasons for which the assessment was sought to be reopened u/s 148 of the Act. The Ld. Counsel submitted that the 154 notice is placed at pages 1 to 4 of the Paper Book

MANOJ TANTIA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 25, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 5944/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5944/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Baani Landbase Pvt Ltd., Dcit, Corporate One, Ground Floor, Vs. Circle-4(2), Plot No.5, District Center, Jasola, Central Revenue Building, Delhi. I.P. Estate, Delhi. Pan No.Aadcb0237E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 156Section 292B

reassessment proceedings which were initiated u/s 147 of the Act, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 154 to rectify the assessment order for the very same reasons for which the assessment was sought to be reopened u/s 148 of the Act. The Ld. Counsel submitted that the 154 notice is placed at pages 1 to 4 of the Paper Book

MAHARASHTRA FEEDS P. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1254/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Feb 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. K. Sampath, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Smita Singh, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 154Section 208Section 234ASection 234CSection 243CSection 245CSection 245DSection 245D(1)Section 245D(4)

rectification application filed by the assessee u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961on the quantum of interest charged u/s 234A & 234B is hereby rejected. The assessee application on the issue of quantum of interest under section 234C is acceptable as interest under section 234C is levied on return of income filed Maharashtra Feeds P Ltd. under section 245C

MAHARASHTRA FEEDS P. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, FARIDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1253/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. K. Sampath, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Smita Singh, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 154Section 208Section 234ASection 234CSection 243CSection 245CSection 245DSection 245D(1)Section 245D(4)

rectification application filed by the assessee u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961on the quantum of interest charged u/s 234A & 234B is hereby rejected. The assessee application on the issue of quantum of interest under section 234C is acceptable as interest under section 234C is levied on return of income filed Maharashtra Feeds P Ltd. under section 245C

ACIT, MORADABAD vs. M/S. JUBILANT ORGANOSYES LTD., J.P. NAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2513/DEL/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Sept 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Verma, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri K.M. Gupta, Adv. & Ms. Poonam
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 251

u/s 154 by the learned Assessing Officer was not the issue of Deferred tax Liability and revaluation reserve. Therefore, the limitation will be counted by the date of original assessment order passed on 31/3/2006 which is expired on 31/3/2010 while notice of rectification is issued on 5/8/2010. Thus, order dt. 15/10/2010 is barred by limitation. Accordingly, the order passed

SHALIMAR TOWN PLANNERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5507/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Jun 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri N.K. Billaiya[Assessment Year: 2006-07] & [Assessment Year: 2007-08] Shalimar Town Planners Pvt. Ltd Vs. The A.C.I.T M-11, Middle Circle, Connaught Circus Central Circle – 23 New Delhi New Delhi Pan : Aabcs 5851 R [Appellant] [Respondent]

For Appellant: Shri Ajau Bhagwani, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT- DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 153Section 153CSection 154Section 234Section 234ASection 234BSection 234B(3)

154 of the Act. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that assessment was completed u/s 153C/153A/143(3) of the Act on 13.12.2009. Subsequently, on perusal of the record, the Assessing Officer noticed that interest u/s 234B of the Act has been short charged. To rectify the mistake, notice was served upon the assessee, giving it an opportunity