M/S PINKY RUBBER UDHYOG (P) LTD.,MEERUT vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

RAJEEV KUMAR,MUZAFFARNAGAR vs. ITO, MUZAFFARNAGAR

In the result this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Suchitra Kambleay: 2009-10 Sh. Rajeev Kumar Vs. Ito, Ward 2(3) C/O Anil Deep & Company, C.As Muzaffarnagar 41/85, Sadar Bazar Muzaffarnagar 251 001 Pan: Acdpk 1538 Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The aS7essmen or reassessment

PARMESHWARI DEVI,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri J. Sudhakar Reddya.Y. 2011-12 Smt.Parmeshwari Devi Vs. Ito, Ward 21(2) Prop. M/S Garg Traders New Delhi 107, 1St Floor, W Mali Manglam Place, Rohini Delhi 85

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The aS7essmen or reassessment

MEENA GUPTA,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-14,NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandra

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 10(2), NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. SURINDER MADAN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri N.K.Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavash. Surinder Madan Asst. Cit, 978/9, Govind Puri, Circle-22(1) Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 Vs. New Delhi. Pan –Aagpm 2931G (Appellant) (Respondent)

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

M/S. DURO TRADERS PVT. LTD.,NOIDA vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava[A.Y 2004-05] M/S Duro Traders Private Ltd Vs. The Addl. C.I.T G-57-58, 1St Floor Noida Range Sector – 18, Noida Noida Pan No: Aabcd 9104 G [Appellant] [Respondent]

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. SANJAY GOEL,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava[A.Y 2009-10] Shri Sanjay Goel Vs. The I.T.O. 13/28, 3Rd Floor Ward 47(3) West Patel Nagar New Delhi New Delhi Pan No: Aakpg 3108 K [Appellant] [Respondent]

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S MBIANS INTERNATIONAQL INC., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S MBIANS INTERNATIONAQL INC., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. SATYENDRA NATH,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SATYENDRA NATH KUCKREJA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. KARAN KHURANA,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. KARAN KHURANA,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. KARAN KHURANA,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

SH. KARAN KHURANA,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

MAYASHEEL CONSTRUCTION,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, GHAZIABAD

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Shri Kuldip Singh

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment

M/S. CHINTELS INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaasstt. Year: 2008-09 Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Asstt. Year: 2010-11

reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment