Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,299 results for “reassessment”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,299 Mumbai1,152 Chennai468 Ahmedabad416 Raipur345 Jaipur345 Bangalore302 Hyderabad247 Kolkata214 Pune208 Chandigarh171 Rajkot151 Indore128 Surat93 Patna87 Nagpur76 Amritsar71 Cuttack68 Agra59 Visakhapatnam53 Ranchi53 Guwahati52 Lucknow49 Jodhpur42 Cochin40 Allahabad39 Dehradun33 Panaji9 Varanasi4 Jabalpur4

Key Topics

Section 14774 Section 153D70 Addition to Income69 Section 153A58 Section 153C52 Section 14849 Section 143(3)44 Limitation/Time-bar44 Section 6836 Section 153

RACHNA GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 29, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5418/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Saubhagya Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR

Section 131Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

natural justice thereby rendering the impugned reassessment void and illegal vide this Hon’ble Tribunal ruling in the case of Vinesh

Showing 1–20 of 1,299 · Page 1 of 65

...

35

Natural Justice27

RACHNA GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2531/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Saubhagya Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR

Section 131Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

natural justice thereby rendering the impugned reassessment void and illegal vide this Hon’ble Tribunal ruling in the case of Vinesh

JSP PROJECTS (P) LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE - 13, DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA number 3646/Del/2025 and

ITA 3647/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member

Section 127(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 63Section 65B

natural justice, is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 11. That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld AO without appreciating that no show cause notice was issued during the course of the assessment proceedings in terms of CBDT Instruction No 20/2015 (Para

JSP PROJECTS (P) LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE - 13, DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA number 3646/Del/2025 and

ITA 3646/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member

Section 127(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 63Section 65B

natural justice, is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 11. That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld AO without appreciating that no show cause notice was issued during the course of the assessment proceedings in terms of CBDT Instruction No 20/2015 (Para

JSP PROJECTS (P) LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE - 13, DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA number 3646/Del/2025 and

ITA 3643/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member

Section 127(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 63Section 65B

natural justice, is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 11. That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld AO without appreciating that no show cause notice was issued during the course of the assessment proceedings in terms of CBDT Instruction No 20/2015 (Para

JSP PROJECTS (P) LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -13, DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA number 3646/Del/2025 and

ITA 3645/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member

Section 127(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 63Section 65B

natural justice, is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 11. That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld AO without appreciating that no show cause notice was issued during the course of the assessment proceedings in terms of CBDT Instruction No 20/2015 (Para

JSP PROJECTS (P) LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE - 13, DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA number 3646/Del/2025 and

ITA 3644/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member

Section 127(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 63Section 65B

natural justice, is bad in law and is liable to be deleted. 11. That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in sustaining the action of the Ld AO without appreciating that no show cause notice was issued during the course of the assessment proceedings in terms of CBDT Instruction No 20/2015 (Para

HAZARI LAL KESARI CHAND,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-48(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 8561/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

For Appellant: N O N EFor Respondent: Shri

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 148

natural justice to the appellant. 3. Brief facts of the case are that, return of income filed by the assessee showing an income of Rs.25,82,990/- which was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act. A search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Sh. Rajendra Jain Group, Sh. Sanjay Choudhary

INSTRUMENTATION LABORATORY INDIA PVT LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 10(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2051/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Shamim Yahya & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.Instrumentation Laboratory Vs. Dcit India Pvt. Ltd. Circle 10(2) 1471-1476, 14Th Floor, New Delhi Aggarwal Millennium Tower- 2, Netaji Subhash Place, Pitampura, New Delhi Pan: Aabci6557N Appellant Respondent

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 234BSection 234CSection 271

natural justice is to prevent miscarriage of justice and denial of principles of audi alteram partem results into such miscarriage of justice. Therefore, the Learned CIT(A) should have afforded reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Therefore, in order to impart substantial justice to the assessee, we reverse the orders of ld. CIT(A) and restore the appeals

RAGHAV BAHL,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1824/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RITU KAPUR,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA , NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1829/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RITU KAPUR,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA , NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1828/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RAGHAV BAHL,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1835/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RITU KAPUR,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA , NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1834/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RITU KAPUR ,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA, NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1832/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RITU KAPUR,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA, NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1833/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RITU KAPUR,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA , NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1830/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RAGHAV BAHL,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA, NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1822/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RAGHAV BAHL,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA, NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1823/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed

RAGHAV BAHL,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1, NOIDA , NOIDA

In the result, the captioned appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 1827/DEL/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandraa.Y. 2013-14 A.Y. 2014-15 A.Y. 2015-16 A.Y. 2016-17 A.Y. 2017-18 A.Y. 2019-20 A.Y. 2018-19

Section 24Section 263Section 263(1)

natural justice deserves to be quashed. 7. That the Ld. Pr. CIT had erred in setting aside the original assessment order and directing the Ld. AO to pass fresh order without appreciating the fact that at most, if any issue to be enquired into shall be restricted to issue indicated in the impugned order passed