ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Astha Chandra[Assessment Year: 2007-08]

section 801B(10) was restricted toRs.3, 19,714/-.” 4. On the aforesaid addition, penalty of Rs.2,30,58,990/- was imposed, which was confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A). 5. Against this order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. We have heard both the parties and perused the records. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee summarized in brief

ACIT, PANIPAT vs. M/S K.T.M INDIA, PANIPAT

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Shri Amit Shuklaita Nos. 5619, 2529/Del/2011 Asstt. Years 2007-08

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. We will first take up the quantum appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 2529/Del/2011. In the said appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,14,777/- on account of pro rata interest on loan given to sister concern u/s

M/S K.T.M INDIA,PANIPAT vs. ADDL. CIT, PANIPAT

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Shri Amit Shuklaita Nos. 5619, 2529/Del/2011 Asstt. Years 2007-08

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. We will first take up the quantum appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 2529/Del/2011. In the said appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,14,777/- on account of pro rata interest on loan given to sister concern u/s

M/S. K.T.M INDIA,PANIPAT vs. ACIT, HARYANA

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Shri Amit Shuklaita Nos. 5619, 2529/Del/2011 Asstt. Years 2007-08

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. We will first take up the quantum appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 2529/Del/2011. In the said appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,14,777/- on account of pro rata interest on loan given to sister concern u/s

M/S. K.T.M INDIA,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, PANIPAT

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawal, Hon’Ble & Shri Amit Shuklaita Nos. 5619, 2529/Del/2011 Asstt. Years 2007-08

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. We will first take up the quantum appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 2529/Del/2011. In the said appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of Rs. 1,14,777/- on account of pro rata interest on loan given to sister concern u/s

DCM SHRIIRAM LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. NEAC, NEW DELHI

u/s 80IA of the Act\naccount of transfer of steam has taken though additional grounds\n\nPage | 42\n\nof appeal be admitted and additional evidences filed in support of\nthe additional claim may deserves to be admitted in the interest of\njustice.\n\n44. On the other hand, Ld. CIT DR seriously objected the\nadmission of additional grounds

DCM SHRIRAM LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), NEW DELHI

u/s 80IA of the Act\naccount of transfer of steam has taken though additional grounds\nITA Nos.927 & 2587/Del/2022,\n704/Del/2021, 4328 & 1495/Del/2024\nPage | 42\nof appeal be admitted and additional evidences filed in support of\nthe additional claim may deserves to be admitted in the interest of\njustice.\n44. On the other hand, Ld. CIT DR seriously objected the\nadmission

DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI

u/s 80IA of the Act\naccount of transfer of steam has taken though additional grounds\nITA Nos.927 & 2587/Del/2022,\n704/Del/2021, 4328 & 1495/Del/2024\nPage | 42 \nof appeal be admitted and additional evidences filed in support of\nthe additional claim may deserves to be admitted in the interest of\njustice.\n44. On the other hand, Ld. CIT DR seriously objected the\nadmission

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. DCM SHRIRAM LTD, NEW DELHI

u/s 80IA of the Act\naccount of transfer of steam has taken though additional grounds\n\nPage | 42\n\nITA Nos.927 & 2587/Del/2022,\n704/Del/2021, 4328 & 1495/Del/2024\n\nof appeal be admitted and additional evidences filed in support of\nthe additional claim may deserves to be admitted in the interest of\njustice.\n\n44. On the other hand, Ld. CIT DR seriously