BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai30Pune7Ahmedabad3Lucknow2Surat2Delhi2Kolkata2Jaipur1Chandigarh1Rajkot1SC1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Addition to Income2

SUMITOMO CORPORATION,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1881/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jun 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kamble(Through Video Conferencing) Sumitomo Corporation Vs Dcit (International Taxation) G-195, Circle-3(1)(2) Sarita Vihar New Delhi New Delhi Aabcs6011P (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 5

penalty proceedings under section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of particular of income with respect to the additions made. 6. That the Ld. AO has erred in not allowing full credit of TDS as claimed by appellant at the time of filing return of income. The credit of TDS allowed

RAJO DEVI,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 32(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 7279/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year 2010-11 Smt. Rajo Devi, The Income Tax Officer, W/O. Reshram, Ward-32(1), Room No.1804, 76, Asola Village, Vs. Fatehpur Beri, 11Th Floor, E-2 Block, Civic New Delhi – 110 074. Centre, New Delhi–110 001. Pan Atwpr3396M (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ca & Shri Pawan Kumar, Ca For Revenue : Shri Mithalesh Kr. Pandey, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CA &For Respondent: Shri Mithalesh Kr. Pandey, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 55ASection 68

penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act separately. 2.1. Aggrieved by the order of the A.O, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who vide order dated 11.09.2018 confirmed the addition made by the A.O. after considering the remand reports from the A.O. The Ld. CIT(A) while confirming the addition made