BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 44Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai20Bangalore8Hyderabad5Delhi4Kolkata3Chennai3Patna2Jaipur2Jodhpur1Cochin1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9Section 142(1)6Section 1434Penalty4Section 270A3Section 271(1)3Section 1423Section 1333Business Income3

BRIJ GOPAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 4800/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M Balaganesh & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 1Section 143Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(2)(a)

44B of the Act (19-36) Audited financial statement (37-62) ii) 19.11.2019 Order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Act making an addition of Rs.5,43,930/- to the income of the appellant company. (63-65) iii) 19.11.2019 Notice issued u/s 274 read with section 270A of the Act (66) iv) 01.01.2020 Appellant company filed an appeal

DDIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. WORLD SPORT NIMBUS PTE LTD., NEW DELHI

Section 270A(2)(a)2

Accordingly appeals filed by the learned AO for all 3 years are dismissed

ITA 6094/DEL/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 May 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri K. Hauthang, Sr. DR
Section 133Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

271(1) (c) of the Act levied by the ld AO. The facts for all these three years are identical except the amount of penalties involved. 5. Therefore, we first state the facts for AY 2002-03. The facts for assessment year 2002 – 03 shows that assessee was issued notice u/s 142 (1) of the income tax act on 26/3/2003

DDIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. WORLD SPORT NIMBUS PTE LTD., NEW DELHI

Accordingly appeals filed by the learned AO for all 3 years are dismissed

ITA 6096/DEL/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 May 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri K. Hauthang, Sr. DR
Section 133Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

271(1) (c) of the Act levied by the ld AO. The facts for all these three years are identical except the amount of penalties involved. 5. Therefore, we first state the facts for AY 2002-03. The facts for assessment year 2002 – 03 shows that assessee was issued notice u/s 142 (1) of the income tax act on 26/3/2003

DDIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. WORLD SPORT NIMBUS PTE LTD., NEW DELHI

Accordingly appeals filed by the learned AO for all 3 years are dismissed

ITA 6095/DEL/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 May 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri K. Hauthang, Sr. DR
Section 133Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

271(1) (c) of the Act levied by the ld AO. The facts for all these three years are identical except the amount of penalties involved. 5. Therefore, we first state the facts for AY 2002-03. The facts for assessment year 2002 – 03 shows that assessee was issued notice u/s 142 (1) of the income tax act on 26/3/2003