BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 272A(2)(g)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai25Mumbai16Cuttack8Surat7Visakhapatnam5Jaipur3Delhi3Pune3Nagpur2Raipur2Chandigarh2Hyderabad1Amritsar1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 272A(2)(g)5Section 201(1)4Section 69A3Penalty2TDS2

PARAMOUNT VILLAS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, RANGE-76, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3446/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshparamount Villas Pvt. Ltd, Vs. Jcit, 208, Second Floor, Sikkha Range-76, Mansion Lsc, Savita New Delhi Vihar, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aagcm6447E

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 272(2)(g)Section 272A(2)(g)Section 275(1)

272A(2)(g) (in ates deductees Rs.) A. B. C. D. E. F. G.* Q1 Form 30.07.2012 18.01.2013 172 161 12,45,000/- 16A Q2 Form 30.10.2012 15.02.2013 108 140 7,69,400/- 16A Q3 Form 30.01.2013 16.02.2013 17 129 1,83,124/- 16A Q4 Form 30.05.2013 18.06.2013 19 171 2,61,838/- 16A Total

LEGEND SURFACE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in the aforesaid manner

ITA 2363/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Oct 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanlegend Surface Developers Private Ltd., Vs. Ito, Ward 75 (2), 127-A, Central Avenue, New Delhi. Sainik Farms, New Delhi – 110 062. (Pan : Aabcl3143M) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: None Revenue By : Shri Vijay B Vasanta, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 30.09.2024 Date Of Order : 04.10.2024 Order Per S.Rifaur Rahman, Am:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Vijay B Vasanta, CIT(DR)
Section 133ASection 195Section 201Section 201(1)

section 195 of the Act. 6.5.7 Therefore, I am of the considered view that the appellant was liable to deposit the TDS amount in Govt. account and the AO had rightly raised the demand u/s 201 (1)/201(lA). This ground raised by the appellant is rejected. 6.6 Ground 2; 3 and 4:- 6.6.1 The grounds

TALHA KHAN,MOHALLA AFGANAN PO AMROHA vs. ADDL.JT.DY.ACIT.NFAC, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC) DELHI

In the result, the Assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3419/DEL/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Nov 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Vimal Kumara.Yr. : 2017-18 Talha Khan, Vs. National Faceless Mohalla Afganan Po Amroha, Appeal Centre (Nfac), Amroha-244221 Delhi Uttar Pradesh (Pan: Ejspk7379K) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Vibhu Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 271FSection 69A

penalty show cause and other notices und section 271F, 271A ; 271B, 271 AAC[1], 272A[1][d] and wrongly assessed income and the head from other sources in place of business income. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that there is a delay of 71 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The reasonable cause for the same