VINOD JINDAL,FARIDABAD, HARYANA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, FARIDABAD, HARYANA
In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed
ITA 1923/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M Balaganeshआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.1918, 1919, 1920, 1921 & 1923/Del/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years:2013-14 To 2017-18 बनाम Shri Vinod Jindal, Dcit, H.No.1203A, Tower C-3, Vs. Central Circle-2, Srs Pearl Heights, Faridabad. Sector-87, Faridabad. Pan No.Aenpj1202Q अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent
Section 250Section 270ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274
271(1)(c) of the Act for Assessment Years 2013-14 to
2016-17 are quashed.
10. We further observed that the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High
Court in the case of Schneider Electric South East Asia (HQ) Pte.
Ltd. vs. ACIT (145 taxmann.com 665) held as under:
“2. By way of the impugned order, dated 09th March,
2022, the Petitioner