BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

135 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi135Mumbai99Chennai80Indore56Jaipur47Hyderabad25Kolkata22Pune19Bangalore17Chandigarh16Panaji13Raipur9Agra8Ahmedabad8Visakhapatnam7Amritsar7Patna7Lucknow6Cochin4Nagpur3Guwahati2Dehradun2Rajkot2Jodhpur2SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 234E236Section 200A(1)56Section 200A55Section 15444TDS31Section 271(1)(c)26Section 271D24Addition to Income24Section 143(3)

MODI RUBBER LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 17(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 2559/DEL/2018[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Jun 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri G.D. Agrawal & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B.R. Mishra, Senior DR
Section 143Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 275

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

Showing 1–20 of 135 · Page 1 of 7

21
Section 27119
Penalty19
Exemption17

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 829/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 828/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1978/DEL/2012[2007-08 (F.Y. 2006-07)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO (TDS & SURVEY), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 827/DEL/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1979/DEL/2012[2008-09 (F.Y. 2007-08)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S. MODIPON LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA No

ITA 1897/DEL/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Apr 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri G.D. Agrawalbefore Shri G.D. Agrawal & And Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawalg.D. Agrawal & And Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 154Section 201(1)

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S MODIPON LTD.,,MODINAGAR vs. ADDL. (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result the ground No

ITA 2275/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Santosh Agarwal, Adv
Section 201(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 272A(2)(k)Section 275

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

M/S MODIPON LTD.,,MODINAGAR vs. ADDL. (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result the ground No

ITA 2276/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Santosh Agarwal, Adv
Section 201(1)Section 246Section 246ASection 253Section 271CSection 272A(2)(k)Section 275

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

JET LITE (INDIA) LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6 (NOW CC-1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 839/DEL/2019[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2024AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Anubhav Sharmajet Lite (India) Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 13, Community Central Circle-6, Centre, Yusuf Sarai, (Now Cc-1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aadcs4480L

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Mr. Waseem Arshad, CIT DR
Section 156Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 251(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 275

271(1)(c) the penalty was proposed to be levied. 8.2 Before proceeding further, the question as to whether this kind of ground can be allowed to be raised under the aeges of simple ground that there was an error in the order of the AO? To my mind, if this kind of interpretation is subscription to, then there

M/S. PERFECT SPRAY PAC PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed and consequently penalty order stands quashed

ITA 1922/DEL/2014[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Aug 2016AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri J.S. Reddy & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Aruna Mittal, CA and Shri Ajay Wadhwa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri F.R. Meena, Senior DR
Section 143Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 272ASection 275(1)(a)

section 246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA,DELHI vs. LD. ITO, WARD 35(1), DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3447/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla, Accountnat Member [Assessment Year: 2021-22] Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Income Tax Officer, Ward-35(1), B-2/38, Ground Floor, E-2, Civic Centre, Delhi-110002 Ashok Vihar, Phase-Ii, Vs Delhi-110052 Pan-Aafhr8657H Appellant Respondent

Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 270A

271- AAB. (7) The penalty referred to in sub-section (1) shall be a sum equal to fifty per cent of the amount of tax payable on under-reported income. (8) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (6) or subsection (7), where under-reported income is in consequence of any misreporting thereof by any person, the penalty referred

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. KOSTUB INVESTMENT LTD., NEW DELHI

Accordingly, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed being infructuous

ITA 2281/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 May 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. N.K.Billaiya & Sh.Anubhav Sharma

Section 143(3)Section 253(5)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 68

246A, and the Commissioner (Appeals) passes the order on or after the 1st day of June, 2003 disposing of such appeal, an order imposing penalty shall be passed before the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or within one year from

CARREFOUR WC & C INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(2), NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 1576/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. N.K.Saini & Ms. Suchitra Kamblecarrefour W & C India Pvt. Dcit Ltd. Circle-5(2) E-22, 2Nd Floor, Hauz Khas, New Delhi New Delhi Vs. Pin- 110016 Pan : Aadcc2042A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. K.Sampath, Adv. & Sh. V.Raja Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Vijay Kr. Jiwani, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 92C

section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee company filed its detailed submissions on 05th May 2015 requesting the Assessing Officer to drop the penalty proceedings. However, the Assessing Officer did not accept the submission made by the Assessee and levied a penalty of Rs.47,40,699/- vide order dated 29th March 2016. 5. Being aggrieved by the Penalty

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9051/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed— (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an appeal to the [***] Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246 or section 246A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9052/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed— (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an appeal to the [***] Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246 or section 246A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9054/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed— (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an appeal to the [***] Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246 or section 246A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9053/DEL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed— (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an appeal to the [***] Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246 or section 246A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-07, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9261/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed— (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an appeal to the [***] Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246 or section 246A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-07, NEW DELHI vs. MOHD. SHAHNAWAZ, NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 9260/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 9051/Del/2019 (A.Y 2008-09) I.T.A. No. 9260/Del/2019 (A.Y 2010-11)

For Appellant: Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv & Sh
Section 269Section 269SSection 269TSection 271Section 271DSection 271ESection 275Section 275(1)(c)

271(5)(1)(c) provides for limitation to initiate penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act, which reads as under: “No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed— (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an appeal to the [***] Commissioner (Appeals) under section 246 or section 246A